Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add MLnz20 magnitude computed from Rapid (Beta VSc7-nightly) #730

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add MLnz20 magnitude computed from Rapid (Beta VSc7-nightly) #730

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

salichon
Copy link

@salichon salichon commented Dec 20, 2024 •
edited
Loading

  • First commit for Temporary MLnz20 Network Magnitude data sets
  • Comes from recomputed network magnitude from GeoNet Rapid
  • Version Sc7-nightly Mlnz20 "beta" ( seiscomp development version)
  • Example fo CSV file display
  • When accepted here this ll need a Readme update: https://github.com/GeoNet/data/blob/main/README.md
    Will be further improved

@salichon salichon self-assigned this Dec 20, 2024
@elidana
Copy link
Contributor

elidana commented Dec 20, 2024 •
edited
Loading

first quick comment: is there a reason why you're using ; instead of the , character as a separator?

@salichon
Copy link
Author

nope and the ";" can be changed to "," :)

@salichon
Copy link
Author

Update @elidana and "functional"
~20000 events all magnitude range Jan to Dec 2024
Range of magnitude could be reworked ( only >3) if needed

@salichon
Copy link
Author

salichon commented Jan 8, 2025

MLnz20 data Update to End of december 2024

  • that should be all for the year
  • 23091 Mlnz20 network magnitudes

@salichon salichon marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2025 01:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@elidana elidana Awaiting requested review from elidana

@JonoHanson JonoHanson Awaiting requested review from JonoHanson

@Thomas-Benson Thomas-Benson Awaiting requested review from Thomas-Benson

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@salichon salichon

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@salichon @elidana