Add ChromatiCraft support, TC magic forest bigger

[Dream-Master]

re-open this pr

#5

[Dream-Master]

@KuroPeach i just reopen the pr .

[KuroPeach]

I used dapi to generate two pictures. This is the comparison of the size of the magic forest after the rwg change. They use the same seeds. The bright green is the magic forest, and the purple is the place of corruption.

before change

after change

[Dream-Master]

@KuroPeach did you test in a GTNH full pack ? (2.3.0)

[Dream-Master]

now the forrest are very huge

[KuroPeach]

I can add bop, the last test only has rwg biome and tc biome, so it is very big

[Dream-Master]

run it in a gtnh 2.3.0 instance

[KuroPeach]

In the case of the full package test, my notebook does not start fast enough. If bop is involved, the test results are not much different from the full package. ：）
before change

after change It seems that only the upper left is the magic forest, there are too many bop biomes

[Dream-Master]

yea but we dont use bop worldgen. We use rwg put bop content to rwg world gen

[KuroPeach]

Yes, this test also uses the rwg generator，Because bop's generator is not a regular polygon, only rwg will generate such a pattern ：）

[Dream-Master]

so what color the magical forest has ?

[KuroPeach]

still is bright green

[Dream-Master]

ok need to check ingame later

[Alastors]

I’m all for it, certain parts of thaumcraft are hidden in the forest and they’re borderline impossible to find, and even when you do they’re only like a chunk total size so effectively useless as currently is.

And I mean it shouldn’t have too much of an effect on existing worlds, I mean it’ll probably cause some sort of jagged chunk borders between the old chunks and new chunks, but honestly that’s not enough of a reason to not do it.

[Dream-Master]

@KuroPeach sorry this take some time. We are willing to test this pr in gtnh can you add this change to a config so we can change values there ? Thanks

[mitchej123]

Needs to be behind a config. It should default to off for existing worlds, but being on for new worlds is fine
I don't want to introduce jagged borders to people that have an existing world unless they opt into it

Other than that seems fine.

[KuroPeach]

@KuroPeach sorry this take some time. We are willing to test this pr in gtnh can you add this change to a config so we can change values there ? Thanks

Sorry, I can't add a configuration file to it. I don't know how to code, I just make the existing modifications, and the original author didn't provide a configuration file to modify the parameters.

[Dream-Master]

Where is the original author so I can contact him or her @KuroPeach ?

[KuroPeach]

https://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/mapping-and-modding-java-edition/minecraft-mods/1281910-teds-world-gen-mods-realistic-world-gen-alpha-1-3
Unable to contact, he or she appears to have been out of the community for 8 years

[Dream-Master]

in this case i see no chance for the pr to be added.