Render gene with CDS subfeatures properly

[cmdcolin]

Possible fix for #1887

before

after

this feature has CDS subfeature so triggers "hasSubSub" in the util

There are a number of weird workarounds here, but it does solve the proximate problem

Sort of unrelated but I think it may be worth making the layout part of a pre-processing routine. The way the code makes the layout as a side product of rendering might not be ideal

[cmdcolin]

this is an interesting issue because I was not able to trust the feature layout's calculation of width. it might be that it needs further investigation

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2863 (96dfb55) into main (d485541) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2863   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.92%   59.92%           
=======================================
  Files         590      590           
  Lines       26573    26574    +1     
  Branches     6450     6450           
=======================================
+ Hits        15923    15925    +2     
+ Misses      10346    10345    -1     
  Partials      304      304           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...gins/svg/src/SvgFeatureRenderer/components/Box.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...gins/svg/src/SvgFeatureRenderer/components/util.ts	91.83% <100.00%> (ø)
...ckages/core/pluggableElementTypes/RpcMethodType.ts	85.41% <0.00%> (+2.08%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d485541...96dfb55. Read the comment docs.

[cmdcolin]

while the code is very workaround-y, it fixes a real issue and alternatives may require a fairly large refactoring. so, we could accept this as is perhaps

larger refactoring might involve making a "Gene" glyph and only doing subsubfeatures for that, but that may require modifications to how chooseGlyph works and then only doing changes in vertical alignment on a Gene feature (currently on main it is sort of trying to add "gene-type glyphs in the middle of a transcript)

[garrettjstevens]

I think this is good, I agree we can do larger refactoring later if needed.