-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 879
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
exempt some labels from stale workflow #2812
exempt some labels from stale workflow #2812
Conversation
I agree because it is logical to review a PR when we have time for it but i also disagree because if a PR with that label gets stale after a month it means that we are slacking and should really review it. I disagree with the issue because i already found many duplicate issues thanks to the stale bot saying, hi this is stale. If something like that is stale i often investigate if its a valid request and if this could be a duplicate of another issue |
Agree with @efb4f5ff-1298-471a-8973-3d47447115dc |
If needed i will summon all the bots for this battle |
Do you think we should have a seperate label we can assign to issues to prevent it from going stale? |
That would be useful |
I think that is a good idea. Maybe we can also use a label for our own PR's that have been laying around for a while? If we go this route i suggest skipping the stale check on PRs when it has a WIP label |
Pull request was closed
exempt some labels from stale workflow
Pull Request Type
Description
I don't feel that the stale workflow should apply to feature requests or PRs that are waiting for review
Testing
Tested in the FreeTube test repo
Desktop
Additional context
Let me know if you agree/disagree with the changes 😃