Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move a bunch of no_grad to ChainRules #780

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 4, 2020
Merged

Move a bunch of no_grad to ChainRules #780

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 4, 2020

Conversation

oxinabox
Copy link
Member

@oxinabox oxinabox commented Sep 3, 2020

this is the partner to JuliaDiff/ChainRules.jl#252
It will fail til that is merged and tagged

What is left is:

Should I bump patch version and tag a release?

@oxinabox oxinabox requested a review from willtebbutt September 3, 2020 12:25
Copy link
Member

@willtebbutt willtebbutt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Just needs patch bump.

@oxinabox
Copy link
Member Author

oxinabox commented Sep 3, 2020

Lets see if Bors can retry those test.
They ran before the ChainRules tag had completed.

bors r+

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2020
780: Move a bunch of no_grad to ChainRules r=oxinabox a=oxinabox

this is the partner to JuliaDiff/ChainRules.jl#252
It will fail til that is merged and tagged

What is left is:

- Types (because JuliaDiff/ChainRulesCore.jl#213) (e.g. `Colon`, `OneTo` `Channel`)
- Things to which the derivative is `Zero()` not `DoesNotExist()` (e.g. `one`, `ones`, `zero`, `zeros`)
- Things that felt too magic: e.g. `Base.eval`


Should I bump patch version and tag a release?

Co-authored-by: Lyndon White <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lyndon White <[email protected]>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Sep 3, 2020

Build failed:

@oxinabox
Copy link
Member Author

oxinabox commented Sep 3, 2020

@bors r+

@oxinabox
Copy link
Member Author

oxinabox commented Sep 4, 2020

Should be good now that we release 0.7.17

bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Sep 4, 2020

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot merged commit ec3fad4 into master Sep 4, 2020
@oxinabox
Copy link
Member Author

oxinabox commented Sep 4, 2020

Who's a good bot?
It is you.
Yes you are

@JuliaRegistrator register

@JuliaRegistrator
Copy link

Comments on pull requests will not trigger Registrator, as it is disabled. Please try commenting on a commit or issue.

@willtebbutt willtebbutt deleted the ox/nondiff branch September 11, 2020 16:18
bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2020
788: fix for rrules with kwargs and multiple zero partials r=willtebbutt a=oxinabox

This fixes JuliaDiff/ChainRulesCore.jl#216
correcting a bug I introduced in #780 

cc @devmotion 


(I have confirmed that the second test that uses the kwargs fails on Zygore#master

Co-authored-by: Lyndon White <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants