-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Record constructor with single write-only parameter should result in properties-based creator, to fix #3897 #3910
Merged
cowtowncoder
merged 1 commit into
FasterXML:2.15
from
yihtserns:records-single-write-only
May 4, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -40,6 +40,20 @@ record SnakeRecord(String myId, String myValue){} | |
|
||
record RecordWithJsonDeserialize(int id, @JsonDeserialize(converter = StringTrimmer.class) String name) { } | ||
|
||
record RecordSingleWriteOnly(@JsonProperty(access = JsonProperty.Access.WRITE_ONLY) int id) { } | ||
|
||
record RecordSomeWriteOnly( | ||
@JsonProperty(access = JsonProperty.Access.WRITE_ONLY) int id, | ||
@JsonProperty(access = JsonProperty.Access.WRITE_ONLY) String name, | ||
String email) { | ||
} | ||
|
||
record RecordAllWriteOnly( | ||
@JsonProperty(access = JsonProperty.Access.WRITE_ONLY) int id, | ||
@JsonProperty(access = JsonProperty.Access.WRITE_ONLY) String name, | ||
@JsonProperty(access = JsonProperty.Access.WRITE_ONLY) String email) { | ||
} | ||
|
||
private final ObjectMapper MAPPER = newJsonMapper(); | ||
|
||
/* | ||
|
@@ -204,6 +218,53 @@ public void testDeserializeJsonDeserializeRecord() throws Exception { | |
assertEquals(new RecordWithJsonDeserialize(123, "Bob"), value); | ||
} | ||
|
||
/* | ||
/********************************************************************** | ||
/* Test methods, JsonProperty(access=WRITE_ONLY) | ||
/********************************************************************** | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
public void testSerialize_SingleWriteOnlyParameter() throws Exception { | ||
String json = MAPPER.writeValueAsString(new RecordSingleWriteOnly(123)); | ||
|
||
assertEquals("{}", json); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// [databind#3897] | ||
public void testDeserialize_SingleWriteOnlyParameter() throws Exception { | ||
RecordSingleWriteOnly value = MAPPER.readValue("{\"id\":123}", RecordSingleWriteOnly.class); | ||
|
||
assertEquals(new RecordSingleWriteOnly(123), value); | ||
} | ||
|
||
public void testSerialize_SomeWriteOnlyParameter() throws Exception { | ||
String json = MAPPER.writeValueAsString(new RecordSomeWriteOnly(123, "Bob", "[email protected]")); | ||
|
||
assertEquals("{\"email\":\"[email protected]\"}", json); | ||
} | ||
|
||
public void testDeserialize_SomeWriteOnlyParameter() throws Exception { | ||
RecordSomeWriteOnly value = MAPPER.readValue( | ||
"{\"id\":123,\"name\":\"Bob\",\"email\":\"[email protected]\"}", | ||
RecordSomeWriteOnly.class); | ||
|
||
assertEquals(new RecordSomeWriteOnly(123, "Bob", "[email protected]"), value); | ||
} | ||
|
||
public void testSerialize_AllWriteOnlyParameter() throws Exception { | ||
String json = MAPPER.writeValueAsString(new RecordAllWriteOnly(123, "Bob", "[email protected]")); | ||
|
||
assertEquals("{}", json); | ||
} | ||
|
||
public void testDeserialize_AllWriteOnlyParameter() throws Exception { | ||
RecordAllWriteOnly value = MAPPER.readValue( | ||
"{\"id\":123,\"name\":\"Bob\",\"email\":\"[email protected]\"}", | ||
RecordAllWriteOnly.class); | ||
|
||
assertEquals(new RecordAllWriteOnly(123, "Bob", "[email protected]"), value); | ||
} | ||
|
||
/* | ||
/********************************************************************** | ||
/* Internal helper methods | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor thing but can remove first check and move inside previous if-block (which checks for
propDef != null
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually I agonized over these 2 options:
I chose Option 2 because it looks easier to understand with just a quick glance. But I'll change it if you feel strongly about Option 1.