-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support inline self modifying code #4165
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
For reference, this is referring to #4161. |
bylaws
force-pushed
the
denuvo
branch
3 times, most recently
from
December 10, 2024 15:29
a4f686b
to
8901dba
Compare
Needs a rebase. |
alyssarosenzweig
approved these changes
Dec 12, 2024
Frontends need to detect this in order to handle SMC within the current block (inline SMC) differently to regular SMC which can just reprotect and continue.
guest instruction Single instruction blocks need to be treated specially when inline SMC is detected, the frontend only needs to reprotect RWX and invalidate caches then continue execution as side effects from the SMC shouldn't be seen until the instruction executes.
When an SMC trap happens: reconstruct the context before the SMC write then compile the write as a single instruction block to reduce it to regular SMC. SMC where the writing instruction is the instruction being patched will hit the signal handler at most twice: the 1st will trigger the write to be compiled as a single instuction block, the 2nd will detect inline SMC of a single instruction block and then just take the usual invalidate+reprotect+continue step, avoiding a potential infinite loop of recompilation.
This is used to notify the JIT of e.g. memory writes by a debugger.
Sonicadvance1
approved these changes
Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When an SMC trap happens: reconstruct the context before the SMC write then compile the write as a single instruction block to reduce it to regular SMC. SMC where the writing instruction is the instruction being patched will hit the signal handler at most twice: the 1st will trigger the write to be compiled as a single instuction block, the 2nd will detect inline SMC of a single instruction block and then just take the usual invalidate+reprotect+continue step, avoiding a potential infinite loop of recompilation.
Ontop of TF support