Fix scan in progress shown for manual request with receipt moved from tracked expense #42984

bernhardoj · 2024-06-03T10:57:43Z

Details

Moving a manual expense with a receipt from tracked expense detected as a scan request.

Fixed Issues

$ #42971
PROPOSAL: #42971 (comment)

Tests

Same as QA Steps

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as QA Steps

QA Steps

Open self DM
Create a new manual track epxense
Open the expense and set a receipt
Go back to the self DM
Choose submit it to someone
Select any user and confirm the submit expense
Verify receipt scan in progress isn't shown in the money request preview

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Screen.Recording.2024-06-03.at.19.03.49.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screen.Recording.2024-06-03.at.18.49.27.mov

iOS: Native

Screen.Recording.2024-06-03.at.18.54.45.mov

iOS: mWeb Safari

Screen.Recording.2024-06-03.at.18.42.03.mov

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2024-06-03.at.18.25.26.mov

MacOS: Desktop

Screen.Recording.2024-06-03.at.18.28.05.mov

…pense

melvin-bot · 2024-06-03T10:57:48Z

@Ollyws Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

bernhardoj · 2024-06-03T11:13:45Z

src/pages/iou/request/step/IOURequestStepConfirmation.tsx

@@ -538,7 +539,9 @@ function IOURequestStepConfirmation({
                    <HeaderWithBackButton
                        title={headerTitle}
                        onBackButtonPress={navigateBack}
-                        shouldShowThreeDotsButton={requestType === CONST.IOU.REQUEST_TYPE.MANUAL && (iouType === CONST.IOU.TYPE.SUBMIT || iouType === CONST.IOU.TYPE.TRACK)}
+                        shouldShowThreeDotsButton={
+                            requestType === CONST.IOU.REQUEST_TYPE.MANUAL && (iouType === CONST.IOU.TYPE.SUBMIT || iouType === CONST.IOU.TYPE.TRACK) && !isMovingTransactionFromTrackExpense


I tried replace the tracked expense receipt and BE will revert it back to the original receipt, so I hide the 3-dot button when moving tracked expense.

Could you clarify where exactly this was occuring? Maybe post a video, thanks.

This one

In main, the 3-dot button doesn't show because the requestType is SCAN, but because we fix it here, the requestType is now manual.

Screen.Recording.2024-06-04.at.21.14.24.mov

Ah I see, yeah I think this makes sense at least for now until it's fixed on the backend.

Ollyws · 2024-06-04T13:44:40Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

01_Android_Native.mp4

Android: mWeb Chrome

02_Android_Chrome.mp4

iOS: Native

03_iOS_Native.mp4

iOS: mWeb Safari

04_iOS_Safari.mp4

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

05_MacOS_Chrome.mp4

MacOS: Desktop

06_MacOS_Desktop.mp4

Ollyws

LGTM.

OSBotify · 2024-06-05T05:37:03Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify · 2024-06-11T23:33:58Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.4.81-11 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

bernhardoj added 2 commits June 3, 2024 18:45

update scan request condition

850b09b

don't show add receipt option when moving transaction from tracked ex…

ea7da78

…pense

bernhardoj requested a review from a team as a code owner June 3, 2024 10:57

melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team June 3, 2024 10:57

melvin-bot bot requested a review from Ollyws June 3, 2024 10:57

prettier

f5e4339

bernhardoj commented Jun 3, 2024

View reviewed changes

Ollyws approved these changes Jun 4, 2024

View reviewed changes

melvin-bot bot requested a review from techievivek June 4, 2024 13:44

techievivek approved these changes Jun 5, 2024

View reviewed changes

techievivek assigned bernhardoj Jun 5, 2024

techievivek merged commit 4e4715f into Expensify:main Jun 5, 2024
17 of 22 checks passed

github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2024

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2024-06-06 #43168

Closed

m-natarajan mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2024

[HOLD for payment 2024-06-20] [HOLD for payment 2024-06-18] iOS - Pay someone - Paid system message is not highlighted when tapping on the message link #43187

Closed

6 tasks

melvin-bot bot mentioned this pull request Jun 11, 2024

[OLLYWS - CHECKLIST] [$250] Track - Preview shows "Receipt scan in progress" after submitting manual expense with receipt #42971

Closed

6 tasks

hungvu193 mentioned this pull request Jun 23, 2024

[HOLD for payment 2024-07-17] [$250] Actionable whisper - No option to add receipt when submitting to someone #43942

Closed

6 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Fix scan in progress shown for manual request with receipt moved from tracked expense #42984

Fix scan in progress shown for manual request with receipt moved from tracked expense #42984

bernhardoj commented Jun 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 3, 2024

bernhardoj Jun 3, 2024

Ollyws Jun 4, 2024

bernhardoj Jun 4, 2024

bernhardoj Jun 4, 2024

Ollyws Jun 4, 2024

Ollyws commented Jun 4, 2024

Ollyws left a comment

OSBotify commented Jun 5, 2024

OSBotify commented Jun 11, 2024

Fix scan in progress shown for manual request with receipt moved from tracked expense #42984

Fix scan in progress shown for manual request with receipt moved from tracked expense #42984

Conversation

bernhardoj commented Jun 3, 2024 • edited Loading

Details

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 3, 2024

bernhardoj Jun 3, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Ollyws Jun 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

bernhardoj Jun 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

bernhardoj Jun 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Ollyws Jun 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Ollyws commented Jun 4, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Ollyws left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

OSBotify commented Jun 5, 2024

OSBotify commented Jun 11, 2024

bernhardoj commented Jun 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading