Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix mention suggestion highlight doesn't move when the text selection moves #39917

Conversation

bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor

Details

The highlight of the mention is based on the prefix. The current prefix doesn't consider the selection position of the input. This PR changes it so it's consistent with emoji suggestion too.

Fixed Issues

$ #39102
PROPOSAL: #39102 (comment)

Tests

Same as QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as QA Steps

QA Steps

  1. Open any chat
  2. Type a mention suggestion
  3. Move the text selection to left/right
  4. Verify the mention highlight also moves based on the text selection
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-04-09.at.19.00.21.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-04-09.at.19.10.58.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-04-09.at.18.58.22.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-04-09.at.18.59.59.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-04-09.at.18.25.38.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-04-09.at.18.57.42.mov

@bernhardoj bernhardoj requested a review from a team as a code owner April 9, 2024 11:27
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team April 9, 2024 11:27
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 9, 2024

@eh2077 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from eh2077 April 9, 2024 11:27
Copy link
Contributor

@eh2077 eh2077 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would you like to update the changes to focus on fixing suggestion highlight issue only please?

@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ function SuggestionEmoji(
<EmojiSuggestions
highlightedEmojiIndex={highlightedEmojiIndex}
emojis={suggestionValues.suggestedEmojis}
prefix={value.slice(suggestionValues.colonIndex + 1, selection.start)}
prefix={value.slice(suggestionValues.colonIndex + 1, selection.end)}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just left a comment in case someone is confused about this change.

I think it makes sense to use selection.end, see below comparison
image

image

(e: NativeSyntheticEvent<TextInputSelectionChangeEventData>) => {
/**
* we pass here e.nativeEvent.selection.end directly to calculateEmojiSuggestion
* because in other case calculateEmojiSuggestion will have an old calculation value
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please update the comment.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

@@ -111,7 +111,8 @@ function Suggestions(

const onSelectionChange = useCallback((e: NativeSyntheticEvent<TextInputSelectionChangeEventData>) => {
const emojiHandler = suggestionEmojiRef.current?.onSelectionChange?.(e);
return emojiHandler;
const mentionHandler = suggestionMentionRef.current?.onSelectionChange?.(e);
return emojiHandler ?? mentionHandler;
Copy link
Contributor

@eh2077 eh2077 Apr 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried to test a corner case with precondition - have a user with Eric :smile: as the first name and empty second name.

By pasting text @eric :sm into composer, I got both two suggestion menus at the same time.
imageimage

As prod has same issue and I'm not sure if this is expected, so I think we can also skip this one in this PR.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I always wondering whether both suggestions will show or not since we don't return anything inside onSelectionChange.

@eh2077
Copy link
Contributor

eh2077 commented Apr 11, 2024

Code looks good to me. I got stuck in building Android App. I'll update checklist once the Android build issue is resolved.

@eh2077
Copy link
Contributor

eh2077 commented Apr 12, 2024

@bernhardoj Typing @ doesn't pop up suggestion menu in my emulator. Note I merged this branch with upstream/main locally and built the App.

android-mention-not-working.mov

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

bernhardoj commented Apr 12, 2024

Thanks for catching that.

The issue I found is that when onSelectionChange of SuggestionMention is called, it still holds the old value of calculateMentionSuggestion which means it contains the old value of value. If I log the value here, it prints the new value, so I conclude that the onSelectionChange is called earlier before SuggestionMention rerenders.

const onSelectionChange = useCallback((e: NativeSyntheticEvent<TextInputSelectionChangeEventData>) => {
const emojiHandler = suggestionEmojiRef.current?.onSelectionChange?.(e);
return emojiHandler;
}, []);

So, I decided to remove onSelectionChange and calculate it in a useEffect when selection is changed.

Btw, you can reproduce it with emoji suggestions too if you remove this useEffect

useEffect(() => {
if (!isComposerFocused) {
return;
}
calculateEmojiSuggestion(selection.end);
}, [selection, calculateEmojiSuggestion, isComposerFocused]);

@eh2077
Copy link
Contributor

eh2077 commented Apr 13, 2024

@bernhardoj There're conflicts need to be resolved.

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Conflicts solved

@eh2077
Copy link
Contributor

eh2077 commented Apr 15, 2024

@bernhardoj I found another bug - suggestion menu is not closed after deleting @. Also confirmed this doesn't happen on the main.

Screen.Recording.2024-04-15.at.12.21.49.AM.mov

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eh2077 I found that on Android mWeb, deleting a character won't immediately update the selection (onSelectionChange is not triggered). So, if I type @b, the selection end is 2, but when I delete it, the selection end is still 2. If I press delete once again, then onSelectionEnd is triggered. I tested this on react-native-web repo and can reproduce it there too. So, it's an upstream bug.

This doesn't happen on main because the useEffect depends on calculateMentionSuggestion which depends on value which I already explained before that leads to another bug.

useEffect(() => {
calculateMentionSuggestion(selection.end);
}, [selection, calculateMentionSuggestion]);

Do you think we should update the useEffect to be the same as main? If yes, we will have this issue that we discussed previously.

@eh2077
Copy link
Contributor

eh2077 commented Apr 15, 2024

@bernhardoj Hmm, I think the new issue introduced - suggestion menu is not closed after deleting @, results in a bit worse UX than the existing issue. So, I prefer to keep it same as main and solve this existing issue - suggestion menu jumping briefly separately.

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Agree, I have updated the useEffect. I also pushed a fix where it's not possible to mention user with 2 words because the prefixType is empty.

@eh2077
Copy link
Contributor

eh2077 commented Apr 15, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
mobile-chrome.mov
iOS: Native
ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
mobile-safari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@eh2077 eh2077 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks good and tested well!

@stitesExpensify stitesExpensify merged commit 888ad66 into Expensify:main Apr 16, 2024
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/stitesExpensify in version: 1.4.63-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.4.63-21 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants