Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Inconsistency in the security page and Request money page #23712

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Sep 21, 2023

Conversation

dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 commented Jul 27, 2023

Details

Fix Inconsistency in the security page and Request money page

Fixed Issues

$ #22660
PROPOSAL: #22660 (comment)

Tests

  1. Go to settings > security > Two factor authentication
  2. Verify that next button is highlighted and clickable
  3. Click it without copying or downloading the codes
  4. Verify that an error message show up
  5. Click FAB, choose Request money
  6. Verify that next button is highlighted and clickable
  7. Click it without entering a valid number
  8. Verify that an error message show up
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Go to settings > security > Two factor authentication
  2. Verify that next button is highlighted and clickable
  3. Click it without copying or downloading the codes
  4. Verify that an error message show up
  5. Click FAB, choose Request money
  6. Verify that next button is highlighted and clickable
  7. Click it without entering a valid number
  8. Verify that an error message show up
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screencast.from.01-09-2023.00.11.24.webm
Mobile Web - Chrome
Record_2023-09-01-00-12-59.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-09-01.at.00.16.06.mp4
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-09-01.at.00.21.59.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-09-01.at.00.20.57.mp4
Android
22660.webm

@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 marked this pull request as ready for review July 27, 2023 08:28
@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 27, 2023 08:28
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from thesahindia and removed request for a team July 27, 2023 08:28
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 27, 2023

@thesahindia Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@thesahindia
Copy link
Member

Waiting for the copy.

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@thesahindia The translation key is confirmed and updated. Please help to review when you have a chance.

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@thesahindia Friendly bump.

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

dukenv0307 commented Aug 14, 2023

@thesahindia ICYMI. Friendly bump. Please help to review the PR when you have time.

@@ -124,6 +129,8 @@ function MoneyRequestAmountForm({amount, currency, isEditing, forwardedRef, onCu
setSelection((prevSelection) => ({...prevSelection}));
return;
}
setIsInvalidAmount(checkAmount(newAmountWithoutSpaces));
setFormError('');
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm thinking that maybe in order to be congruent with the Form pages we should only clear the error once the user has input a valid amount. Example:

Screen.Recording.2023-08-21.at.16.27.08.mov

Copy link
Contributor Author

@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 Aug 21, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Ollyws I just updated.

isDisabled={!currentAmount.length || parseFloat(currentAmount) < 0.01}
text={buttonText}
/>
<View style={[styles.w100, styles.mt5]}>
Copy link
Contributor

@Ollyws Ollyws Aug 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we update the alignment to match the other Form pages? Thanks.

Screenshot 2023-08-22 at 15 49 34 Screenshot 2023-08-22 at 15 49 42

Also I'm wondering if we can stop the input from moving up when the error is added, it's a bit jarring:

Screen.Recording.2023-08-22.at.15.57.19.mov

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Ollyws I think it's hard to prevent jumping because the input has style flex:1.
@shawnborton I think we should confirm here again. Should we disable the next button of money request flow?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What does this look like on mobile where we show the full keypad too?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it looks like this.

Screenshot 2023-08-22 at 22 50 18

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some UI could be broken as @Ollyws commented here So I think we should only not disable the button in CodesSteps of TwoFactor

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like we should consider moving that error message to be below the green button for consistency. I think it's probably okay if the UI jumps slightly because the alternatives aren't really too great. We'd have to give a an area a fixed height to prevent jumping, which kind of feels like we'd be optimizing for the less common case.

Also, we should make the error text use our text.Supporting color, but keep the dot red.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like we should consider moving that error message to be below the green button for consistency

What does that mean? I saw the error message is always above the confirm button.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shawnborton please help me in the comment above when you have a chance.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But then that makes an awkward gap between the green button and the keypad. So I think for this one, we should move the error message to be below the green submit button.

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Ollyws Updated @shawnborton suggestion, please help to review again.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Are the screenshots updated?

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shawnborton I just updated all screenshots, please help to check again.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Cool, that works for me. Real quickly though, have we considered putting the error message directly below the area that holds the amount? Like this area here:
image

Basically directly above all of the numperpad buttons. I wonder if that would actually make this feel better because:

  • the green button won't jump around, nor would the numberpad buttons
  • on desktop, the red error message would just fall towards the bottom and above the green button since there is no numberpad

Could we just see a quick version of that and then we can decide which we like better?

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

dukenv0307 commented Aug 31, 2023

@shawnborton Is it your suggestion?

image

Screenshot from 2023-08-31 09-17-45

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated.

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Ollyws Do you think we should show the error if the input is blurred and the amount is invalid.

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Sep 15, 2023

@dukenv0307 Thanks for the update. No I don't think it's necessary to show the error when the input is blurred.

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Sep 15, 2023

@dukenv0307 Could we also please get #23712 (comment) aligned on the CodesPage too, thanks.

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Ollyws I updated.

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Sep 19, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
MacOS_Web.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
Android_Chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
iOS_Safari.mp4
Desktop
MacOS_Desktop.mp4
iOS
iOS_Native.mp4
Android
Android_Native.mp4

Copy link
Contributor

@Ollyws Ollyws left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from tgolen September 19, 2023 10:23
src/pages/iou/steps/MoneyRequestAmountForm.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pages/iou/steps/MoneyRequestAmountForm.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pages/iou/steps/MoneyRequestAmountForm.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tgolen I updated.

@tgolen tgolen merged commit b00e8a0 into Expensify:main Sep 21, 2023
11 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@neonbhai neonbhai mentioned this pull request Sep 22, 2023
59 tasks
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/tgolen in version: 1.3.73-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.73-1 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/tgolen in version: 1.3.74-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/chiragsalian in version: 1.3.74-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Comment on lines +248 to +254
{!_.isEmpty(formError) && firstPress && (
<FormHelpMessage
style={[styles.ph5]}
isError
message={translate(formError)}
/>
)}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd say #29204 is a regression as it could have been handled as part of this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants