Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor AttachmentModal to function component #20365

Conversation

rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah commented Jun 7, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #16114
PROPOSAL: #16114 (comment)

Tests

  1. Open a chat
  2. Upload an Attachment via button or via drag and drop
  3. Verify that a modal appears displaying a preview of the file
  4. Click send and verify that the file is sent successfully in the discussion
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Open a chat
  2. Upload an Attachment via button or via drag and drop
  3. Verify that a modal appears displaying a preview of the file
  4. Click send and verify that the file is sent successfully in the discussion
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
attachement_modal.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
safari.mp4
Desktop
mac.mp4
iOS
ios.mp4
Android
android.mp4

@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah requested a review from a team as a code owner June 7, 2023 14:00
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from marcochavezf and rushatgabhane and removed request for a team June 7, 2023 14:00
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 7, 2023

@marcochavezf @rushatgabhane One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 7, 2023

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah force-pushed the migrate-attachment-modal-to-function-component branch from fd6026f to dda2164 Compare June 8, 2023 16:57
@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor Author

@marcochavezf @rushatgabhane please review this PR

@marcochavezf
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @rayane-djouah thank you for the bumps. @rushatgabhane (Contributor+ team member) will review the PR first🙂

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

@marcochavezf Can you please assign this to me as @rushatgabhane has too much on his plate ATM?

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

Thanks @allroundexperts!

@marcochavezf
Copy link
Contributor

@marcochavezf Can you please assign this to me as @rushatgabhane has too much on his plate ATM?

Sure!

@marcochavezf marcochavezf requested review from allroundexperts and removed request for rushatgabhane June 12, 2023 21:44
@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

@rayane-djouah Can you please upload screen recordings on all platforms?

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

allroundexperts commented Jun 12, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-06-13.at.4.08.30.AM.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-06-13.at.4.13.02.AM.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-06-13.at.4.10.26.AM.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-06-13.at.4.09.39.AM.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-06-13.at.4.12.10.AM.mov
Android
Screen.Recording.2023-06-13.at.4.13.58.AM.mov

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

@rayane-djouah Can you please also change your commit messages so that they are more meaningful? Messages like fix make the commit history really hard to read / understand.

@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah force-pushed the migrate-attachment-modal-to-function-component branch 4 times, most recently from d4c51ce to b982e8a Compare June 13, 2023 23:13
@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

@rayane-djouah The screen recordings are still missing. Can you please add them?

@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah force-pushed the migrate-attachment-modal-to-function-component branch from b982e8a to 66cb6c3 Compare June 14, 2023 18:57
@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor Author

@allroundexperts I added the screen recordings. can you please review?

Copy link
Contributor

@allroundexperts allroundexperts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!
cc @marcochavezf

@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah force-pushed the migrate-attachment-modal-to-function-component branch from 66cb6c3 to 7caaad3 Compare June 16, 2023 12:55
@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor Author

@marcochavezf PR ready for merge.

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor Author

@marcochavezf

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor Author

@marcochavezf please review this PR

Copy link
Contributor

@marcochavezf marcochavezf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @rayane-djouah! LGTM

@marcochavezf marcochavezf merged commit 6138bec into Expensify:main Jun 20, 2023
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/marcochavezf in version: 1.3.30-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.3.30-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Comment on lines -115 to +107
onNavigate(attachment) {
this.setState(attachment);
}
const onNavigate = useCallback((attachment) => {
setSource(attachment.source);
setFile(attachment.file);
}, []);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Julesssss
This is the change that caused #22133

Previously this.setState(attachment) saved source, file and isAuthTokenRequired to state
Now isAuthTokenRequired is no longer set
The flag isAuthTokenRequired is used in the download logic to create the URL needed for downloading attachments

To fix the issue we'd need to also update the isAuthTokenRequired like so:

    const onNavigate = useCallback((attachment) => {
        setSource(attachment.source);
        setFile(attachment.file);
        setIsAuthTokenRequired(attachment.isAuthTokenRequired);
    }, []);

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kidroca I think this might not be correct. We tested the downloads before merging this PR. Please check this video.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your input, @allroundexperts. I appreciate your vigilance and the tests you performed before merging the PR. However, I'd like to highlight the way fileDownload operates. It relies heavily on the isAuthTokenRequired as detailed in my comment #22133 (comment)

It's plausible that during the tests, downloading the initial image worked as expected, which could be misleading. The issue arises when attempting to download any subsequent image after scrolling through the carousel. This is due to the isAuthTokenRequired state not updating accordingly.

Moreover, with the transition of the carousel to its own route, the onNavigate function gets invoked immediately to set the initial state for the modal, further highlighting the need for an updated isAuthTokenRequired state. I hope this clarification helps!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That does make sense. This is a clear oversight. However, it might be worth checking what actually caused the issue since this was merged 3 weeks ago and we tested the downloads again with this PR which got merged 4 days ago 🤔

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll try to pinpoint the exact change which caused this. We would surely want to fix this as well though.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request #20167, which moved the carousel, depended on the proper functioning of the onNavigate function. This function is invoked when the carousel mounts and sets the correct value of isAuthTokenRequired. While we diligently resolved several merge conflicts when syncing main with #20167, it's conceivable that this particular modification related to isAuthTokenRequired may have been overlooked. Notably, this PR had received approval a while back, but the merging process was delayed due to a code freeze, which could have further contributed to the oversight.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, that makes sense. I reverted back to 50c16acc83 and it seemed to work fine. Now we have a clearer picture. Thanks @kidroca!

@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah deleted the migrate-attachment-modal-to-function-component branch September 4, 2023 12:33
modalType: CONST.MODAL.MODAL_TYPE.CENTERED_UNSWIPEABLE,
isConfirmButtonDisabled: false,
confirmButtonFadeAnimation: new Animated.Value(1),
file: props.originalFileName
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coming from #28036:
We could have updated file state value whenever originalFileName prop changes in useEffect.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The root cause is here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants