Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOLD for payment 2024-11-01] [$250] Tag rules - Tag rules are available for multi tags when the rules are not present on Old Dot #49543

Closed
6 tasks done
IuliiaHerets opened this issue Sep 20, 2024 · 43 comments
Assignees
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2 Engineering External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor

Comments

@IuliiaHerets
Copy link

IuliiaHerets commented Sep 20, 2024

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 9.0.39-0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N/A - new feature, doesn't exist in prod
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): [email protected]
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team

Action Performed:

Precondition:

  • Rules are enabled
  • Dependent multi tags are set up on OD.
  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to workspace settings > Tags.
  3. Click on any main tag.
  4. Click on any sub tag.

Expected Result:

Tag rules should not be available for multi tags (because the rules are not present on Old Dot).

Actual Result:

Tag rules are available for multi tags when the rules are not present on Old Dot.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Bug6610082_1726848355301!Dependent_-_Multi_Level_tags_NEW.csv

Bug6610082_1726848355336.20240920_235201.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~021843317478267181555
  • Upwork Job ID: 1843317478267181555
  • Last Price Increase: 2024-10-14
  • Automatic offers:
    • situchan | Contributor | 104469276
Issue OwnerCurrent Issue Owner: @bfitzexpensify
@IuliiaHerets IuliiaHerets added DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. labels Sep 20, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 20, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @strepanier03 (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Daily KSv2 label Sep 20, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added Engineering Hourly KSv2 and removed Daily KSv2 labels Sep 20, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

  1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
  2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
  3. Fix the issue yourself.

@IuliiaHerets
Copy link
Author

We think that this bug might be related to #wave-control

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 20, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @deetergp (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

@deetergp deetergp removed the DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment label Sep 20, 2024
@deetergp
Copy link
Contributor

This is behind a beta so it's not a blocker.

cc @marcaaron

@deetergp deetergp added Daily KSv2 and removed Hourly KSv2 labels Sep 20, 2024
@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

I'm also slightly confused about why we don't allow approvers on multi-level tags. Maybe there's just not much overlap or it would be strange to potentially have multiple approvers? @JmillsExpensify what do you think about this one?

@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not able to reproduce this on main fwiw. @yuwenmemon is working on tags related features for NewDot, maybe we can ask him to keep an eye on this.

@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

2024-09-20_09-19-09

maybe this has something to do with multiple policy set up with different configurations?

@IuliiaHerets
Copy link
Author

@marcaaron Policy should be Control, you can enable Rules in More features to upgrade it

@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

Yes. Tested with a Control policy. The provided steps do not lead to a reproduction.

@IuliiaHerets
Copy link
Author

Issue is still reproducible, tested just now

bandicam.2024-09-20.23-07-06-209.mp4

@strepanier03 strepanier03 added Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. and removed Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. labels Sep 21, 2024
@strepanier03 strepanier03 removed their assignment Sep 21, 2024
@strepanier03 strepanier03 removed the Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. label Sep 21, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 21, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @bfitzexpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

@strepanier03 strepanier03 added the Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. label Sep 21, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors Overdue labels Oct 17, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 17, 2024

📣 @situchan 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Contributor role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app!

Offer link
Upwork job
Please accept the offer and leave a comment on the Github issue letting us know when we can expect a PR to be ready for review 🧑‍💻
Keep in mind: Code of Conduct | Contributing 📖

@deetergp
Copy link
Contributor

Swapped out @parasharrajat for @situchan. Thanks for stepping up, Situ!

@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

restrict the tag rule settings for multi-tags for now

So this is what we landed!

The proposal looks good. I think we can continue PR.
🎀👀🎀 C+ reviewed

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Current assignee @deetergp is eligible for the choreEngineerContributorManagement assigner, not assigning anyone new.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Reviewing Has a PR in review Weekly KSv2 and removed Daily KSv2 labels Oct 18, 2024
@deetergp
Copy link
Contributor

@rezkiy37 Proposal looks good. Adding them now.

@dylanexpensify dylanexpensify moved this to Release 3: Fall 2024 (Nov) in [#whatsnext] #expense Oct 18, 2024
@rezkiy37
Copy link
Contributor

I've opened a PR (#50917) for review 🙂

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Oct 25, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title [$250] Tag rules - Tag rules are available for multi tags when the rules are not present on Old Dot [HOLD for payment 2024-11-01] [$250] Tag rules - Tag rules are available for multi tags when the rules are not present on Old Dot Oct 25, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 25, 2024

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Reviewing Has a PR in review label Oct 25, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 25, 2024

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.53-1 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-11-01. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 25, 2024

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

  • [@situchan] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
  • [@situchan] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
  • [@situchan] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
  • [@situchan] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
  • [@situchan] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
  • [@bfitzexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Daily KSv2 and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Oct 31, 2024
@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

situchan commented Nov 4, 2024

There was no regression.

Regression Test Proposal

Precondition:
The rules are enabled.
Dependent multi-tags are set up on OD.

  1. Go to workspace settings > Tags.
  2. Click on any main tag.
  3. Click on any sub tag.
  4. Verify that the tag rules should not be available for multi-tags.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Nov 4, 2024
@bfitzexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Payment complete, regression steps added. Closing this out, thanks everyone!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Nov 4, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Release 3: Fall 2024 (Nov) to Done in [#whatsnext] #expense Nov 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2 Engineering External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants