-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2023-08-10] [$1000] Parent Message of thread chat on LHN doesn't updated when the parent message is updated #23424
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @tjferriss ( |
Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)
|
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.When editing the parent message of a thread, the LHN item title does not update. What is the root cause of that problem?The LHN menu item uses an App/src/components/LHNOptionsList/OptionRowLHNData.js Lines 73 to 81 in cd851d0
In the case of a thread, the title (report name) is derived using Additionally, the component as a whole is also wrapped in
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?We should add the report name as a dependency of the What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)Alternatively, we can add a different field to the report, such as the last modified date (e.g. The advantage of this approach is that it will use the existing dependencies. |
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.Parent Message of thread chat on LHN doesn't updated when the parent message is updated What is the root cause of that problem?When deleting the parent message of thread, we don't have any update on the report field of that thread report
So that optionItem in here is not rendered again
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?We can subscribe parentReportAction of the thread and we will get option item again if parentReportAction change
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)We should introduce new field called |
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~016848c21d8e7b7eeb |
Triggered auto assignment to @mallenexpensify ( |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @parasharrajat ( |
Overdue no more, Melvin. Adding External label. |
Ok, this is a tricky one. Both proposals are correct. But @dukenv0307's proposal is more elegant. @dukenv0307 Is there a way to listen for only one action instead of the whole collection? May be using 🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed |
Triggered auto assignment to @puneetlath, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details. |
📣 @parasharrajat Please request via NewDot manual requests for the Reviewer role ($1000) |
📣 @dukenv0307 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Contributor role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app! Offer link |
📣 @dukenv0307 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Reporter role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app! |
@parasharrajat The PR is ready for review. |
🎯 ⚡️ Woah @parasharrajat / @dukenv0307, great job pushing this forwards! ⚡️ The pull request got merged within 3 working days of assignment, so this job is eligible for a 50% #urgency bonus 🎉
On to the next one 🚀 |
PR is merged but held on QA #23777 (comment) |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.49-3 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-08-10. 🎊 After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:
|
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
|
Payment comment has been updated with contributors and amounts #23424 (comment) @parasharrajat can you get started on the checklist when you have a chance? |
All set for payment barring regression. @parasharrajat can you grab the checklist when you have a minute? |
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
Regression Test Steps
Do you agree 👍 or 👎 ? |
Payment requested. |
@dukenv0307 has been paid via Upworks. Regression test has been submitted https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/307290 @parasharrajat did you request payment via NewDot? |
@tjferriss Yes. |
Reviewed the details for @parasharrajat. Payment summarized above by BZ member is approved for payment in NewDot. |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
Parent Message of thread chat on LHN should be updated
Actual Result:
Parent Message of thread chat on LHN doesn't updated
Workaround:
Can the user still use Expensify without this being fixed? Have you informed them of the workaround?
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Version Number: 1.3.44-0
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation
Screen.Recording.2023-07-22.at.17.04.50.mov
Recording.1321.mp4
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @dukenv0307
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1690020315164019
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: