-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: submit reward must be successful on exocore chain #116
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in the pull request focus on the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ExocoreGateway
User->>ExocoreGateway: Submit Reward
ExocoreGateway->>ExocoreGateway: Check Reward Submission
alt Successful Submission
ExocoreGateway-->>User: Reward Processed
else Failed Submission
ExocoreGateway-->>User: Revert Submission
end
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/core/ExocoreGateway.sol (1)
417-419
: Approved: Error handling for reward submission aligns with PR objective.The added error handling ensures that reward submissions must be successful, which aligns with the PR objective. This change enhances the contract's integrity by preventing unexpected failures during reward submissions.
However, consider the following suggestions:
Use a more specific error message for reward submission failures. The current message
DepositRequestShouldNotFail
might be confusing in the context of reward submission.Consider implementing similar error handling for other critical operations in the contract to maintain consistency and robustness.
Consider updating the error message to be more specific:
- revert Errors.DepositRequestShouldNotFail(srcChainId, lzNonce); + revert Errors.RewardSubmissionShouldNotFail(srcChainId, lzNonce);Don't forget to add the corresponding error message in the
Errors
library.
Description
To follow our design principal, we should assume that
submitReward
must be successfulSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes