unifying/improving spelling of names within the PaNET ontology

[kara-mela]

I recognized that the terminology in PaNET is already widely unified, however I discovered some exceptions. It would be great if you could have a look at it:

1. ‘spin echo scattering’ -> space
2. 'high resolution' is spelled without dash in almost all cases, except for 'high resolution neutron imaging'
3. some few names with abbreviations, please avoid

• EUV -> extreme ultra violet, UV -> ultra violet, VUV -> vacuum ultra violet
• 'IR photon probe' is the only case where IR is used instead of infrared
• 'time of flight' is the generally used spelling, exceptions are 'pulsed neutron TOF probe' and 'time-of-flight spectrometry'
• XMCD -> 'x-ray magnetic circular dichroism'

[kara-mela]

I just recognized, that my intention with point 1. is not visible: there is an additional space between 'echo' and 'scattering' that should be deleted.

[spc93]

Some comments:

• Names are copied from existing sources wherever possible.
• Adopted style is lower-case except for acronyms
• We assume the names are not case-sensitive in order to avoid a proliferation of terms using different case.
• We assume that there is no significant preference for label over alt-label, i.e. all labels have the same importance.
• Abbreviations and acronyms are treated as any other label/alt-label
• There are some mistakes!

[paulmillar]

We should probably capture this "style guide" in the PaNET SOP document --- I don't think it's there currently.

[paulmillar]

So, based on the above comments, should @kara-mela open a pull-request to resolve this issue?

[paulmillar]

Some comments:

@spc93 Just to let you know, I've taken your comments and put them in the Standard Operating Procedure document as a starting point for a naming convention.