Updates for RCEMIP phase 2 #6616
Conversation
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good. I think if I did it I would have only one MW compset with the SST mean and delta being namelist parameters that could be defined at will by the user (similar to how I did it for the branch I have on SCREAM repo). But I also understand why you did it the way you did so that's just a comment.
This adds compsets and new output variables to facilitate the E3SM and E3SM-MMF contributions to phase 1 & 2 of the radiative-convective equilibrium model inter-comparison project (RCEMIP). [BFB]
|
@whannah1 did you expect some namelist diffs which lead to diffs with baselines? Only in ERP_Ln9.ne4pg2_ne4pg2.FRCE and ERS_Ln9.ne4pg2_ne4pg2.FRCE-MMF1 |
Yes, sorry I forgot to make a note about this. When I originally created the RCE compsets I made a tiny mistake in the value of |
|
Also seeing a runtime error with this test: ERP_Ld3.ne4pg2_ne4pg2.FIDEAL.chrysalis_intel.allactive-pioroot1 on both chrysalis and pm-cpu. |
|
@rljacob I confirmed that the latest commit fixes the FIDEAL test fail. I only did a single test on Chrysalis, but the fix should also fix the PM failure. |
This adds compsets and new output variables to facilitate the E3SM and E3SM-MMF contributions to phase 1 & 2 of the radiative-convective equilibrium model inter-comparison project (RCEMIP) 2nd merge of this PR
This adds compsets and new output variables to facilitate the E3SM and E3SM-MMF
contributions to phase 1 & 2 of the radiative-convective equilibrium model inter-comparison project (RCEMIP).
NOTE: in the original RCE compsets there was a slight error in the value of constant_zenith_deg being off by 1/100. This difference is inconsequential, but I wanted to fix it here to ensure consistency with the other RCEMIP models.
[non-BFB] - only for RCE cases because of updated constant_zenith_deg value