False reports on SystemParametersInfo #10

derekbruening · 2014-11-28T01:48:11Z

From [email protected] on July 21, 2010 12:05:22

On Windows XP, build the following file:

#include <windows.h>
#pragma comment(lib, "User32.lib")
int main(void) {
NONCLIENTMETRICS metrics;
ZeroMemory(&metrics, sizeof(NONCLIENTMETRICS));
metrics.cbSize = sizeof(NONCLIENTMETRICS);
SystemParametersInfo(SPI_GETNONCLIENTMETRICS, sizeof(NONCLIENTMETRICS), &metrics, 0);
return 0;
}

$ cl test.c
$ drmemory.exe test.exe # r378 / r24 ...

Please note that I've seen these UxTheme reports in a few places, so this maybe related to a larger issue.

Attachment: report.txt

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/drmemory/issues/detail?id=10

derekbruening · 2014-11-28T01:48:12Z

From [email protected] on August 04, 2010 07:14:19

Labels: Bug-FalsePositive

derekbruening · 2014-11-28T01:48:17Z

From [email protected] on July 15, 2011 11:45:44

fixed in r371 for issue #484 maybe this can be added to the app_suite?

Status: Fixed
Owner: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]

derekbruening · 2014-11-28T01:48:22Z

From [email protected] on July 15, 2011 11:47:50

Sure, no problem.
Should be as simple as copy-pasting

Status: Started

derekbruening · 2014-11-28T01:48:28Z

From [email protected] on July 18, 2011 04:23:27

The test was added to app_suite in r398 and revealed a possible leak:
[XP 32-bit w/o symbols]
Error #1: POSSIBLE LEAK 80 direct bytes 0x000684a0-0x000684f0 + 0 indirect bytes
0x77f1ab26 <GDI32.dll+0xab26> GDI32.dll!GetBitmapBits
0x77f192cb <GDI32.dll+0x92cb> GDI32.dll!CreateFontIndirectExW
0x77f193e4 <GDI32.dll+0x93e4> GDI32.dll!CreateFontIndirectW
0x5ad7ae55 <UxTheme.dll+0xae55> UxTheme.dll!Ordinal25
0x5ad74693 <UxTheme.dll+0x4693> UxTheme.dll!GetThemeColor
0x5ad79602 <UxTheme.dll+0x9602> UxTheme.dll!IsThemeActive
0x5ad7ad7b <UxTheme.dll+0xad7b> UxTheme.dll!Ordinal25
0x7e427f06 <USER32.dll+0x17f06> USER32.dll!SetProcessWindowStation
0x7e428069 <USER32.dll+0x18069> USER32.dll!GetGUIThreadInfo
0x7c90e473 <ntdll.dll+0xe473> ntdll.dll!KiUserCallbackDispatcher
0x00406e26 <app_suite_tests.exe+0x6e26> app_suite_tests.exe!NtUserTests_SystemParametersInfoA_Test::TestBody
tests\app_suite\ntuser_tests_win.cpp:31

[Vista x64 w/o symbols]
Error #1: POSSIBLE LEAK 80 direct bytes 0x0119b2d0-0x0119b320 + 0 indirect bytes
0x771287a9 <GDI32.dll+0x187a9> GDI32.dll!CreatePatternBrush
0x77128675 <GDI32.dll+0x18675> GDI32.dll!CreateFontIndirectExW
0x77128724 <GDI32.dll+0x18724> GDI32.dll!CreateFontIndirectW
0x7509b50a <UxTheme.dll+0x1b50a> UxTheme.dll!ThemeInitApiHook
0x75091e9c <UxTheme.dll+0x11e9c> UxTheme.dll!Ordinal43
0x7509a9ed <UxTheme.dll+0x1a9ed> UxTheme.dll!GetThemeBitmap
0x7509b1ad <UxTheme.dll+0x1b1ad> UxTheme.dll!ThemeInitApiHook
0x76e71cbc <USER32.dll+0x21cbc> USER32.dll!SetWindowsHookExA
0x76e719f5 <USER32.dll+0x219f5> USER32.dll!RegisterClassExW
0x77aae496 <ntdll.dll+0x1e496> ntdll.dll!KiUserCallbackDispatcher
0x000c6e26 <app_suite_tests.exe+0x6e26> app_suite_tests.exe!NtUserTests_SystemParametersInfoA_Test::TestBody
tests\app_suite\ntuser_tests_win.cpp:31

[Win 7 x64 w/o symbols]
Error #1: POSSIBLE LEAK 80 direct bytes 0x01031280-0x010312d0 + 0 indirect bytes
0x76d75e29 <GDI32.dll+0x15e29> GDI32.dll!CreatePatternBrush
0x76d75bb0 <GDI32.dll+0x15bb0> GDI32.dll!CreateFontIndirectExW
0x76d75c63 <GDI32.dll+0x15c63> GDI32.dll!CreateFontIndirectW
0x73a45117 <UxTheme.dll+0x15117> UxTheme.dll!GetThemeBitmap
0x73a42a40 <UxTheme.dll+0x12a40> UxTheme.dll!Ordinal43
0x73a44215 <UxTheme.dll+0x14215> UxTheme.dll!IsThemePartDefined
0x73a446ed <UxTheme.dll+0x146ed> UxTheme.dll!ThemeInitApiHook
0x768facd4 <USER32.dll+0x1acd4> USER32.dll!UnregisterClassW
0x768fab0e <USER32.dll+0x1ab0e> USER32.dll!UnregisterClassW
0x77dd011a <ntdll.dll+0x1011a> ntdll.dll!KiUserCallbackDispatcher
0x01206e26 <app_suite_tests.exe+0x6e26> app_suite_tests.exe!NtUserTests_SystemParametersInfoA_Test::TestBody
tests\app_suite\ntuser_tests_win.cpp:31

Owner: [email protected]
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Low

derekbruening · 2014-11-28T01:48:33Z

From [email protected] on July 18, 2011 04:25:18

[XP 32-bits WITH symbols]
Error #1: POSSIBLE LEAK 80 direct bytes 0x00158790-0x001587e0 + 0 indirect bytes
0x77f1ab26 <GDI32.dll+0xab26> GDI32.dll!plfCreateLOCALFONT
0x77f192cb <GDI32.dll+0x92cb> GDI32.dll!CreateFontIndirectExW
0x77f193e4 <GDI32.dll+0x93e4> GDI32.dll!CreateFontIndirectW
0x5ad7ae55 <UxTheme.dll+0xae55> UxTheme.dll!CInternalNonclientMetrics::Acquire
0x5ad74693 <UxTheme.dll+0x4693> UxTheme.dll!NcGetNonclientMetrics
0x5ad79602 <UxTheme.dll+0x9602> UxTheme.dll!AcquireNcThemeMetrics
0x5ad7ad7b <UxTheme.dll+0xad7b> UxTheme.dll!OnHooksEnabled
0x7e427f06 <USER32.dll+0x17f06> USER32.dll!InitUserApiHook
0x7e428069 <USER32.dll+0x18069> USER32.dll!__ClientLoadLibrary
0x7c90e473 <ntdll.dll+0xe473> ntdll.dll!KiUserCallbackDispatcher
0x00401059 <test.exe+0x1059> test.exe!main
test.c:12

derekbruening · 2014-11-28T01:48:38Z

From [email protected] on July 18, 2011 05:25:29

These leaks are suppressed in app_suite since r399

derekbruening · 2014-11-28T01:48:44Z

From [email protected] on July 19, 2011 03:28:06

OK, looks like this possible leak report also shows up on issue #17 , so marking this as fixed.

Status: Fixed

AArch64 port of drmemory. Only contains slowpath support with shared_slowpath off. Pattern mode and fastpath modes are being worked on separately. Depends on: https://github.com/DynamoRIO/dynamorio/tree/mem-ref-for-clean-calls-aarch64/core Current tests we have analysed: Test project /home/grecaw01/APD-testing/drmem-upstream3/drmemory/build Start 1: drmf_proj 1/49 Test #1: drmf_proj ......................... Passed 0.45 sec Start 2: unit_tests 2/49 Test #2: unit_tests ........................ Passed 0.02 sec Start 3: hello 3/49 Test #3: hello ............................. Passed 3.55 sec Start 4: free 4/49 Test #4: free .............................. Passed 3.67 sec Start 5: malloc 5/49 Test #5: malloc ............................ Passed 3.88 sec Start 6: leak_indirect 6/49 Test #6: leak_indirect ..................... Passed 3.52 sec Start 7: patterns 7/49 Test #7: patterns .......................... Passed 3.93 sec Start 8: free.exitcode 8/49 Test #8: free.exitcode ..................... Passed 3.64 sec Start 9: track_origins 9/49 Test #9: track_origins .....................***Failed 0.34 sec Start 10: free.pattern 10/49 Test #10: free.pattern ......................***Failed 0.35 sec Start 11: malloc.pattern 11/49 Test #11: malloc.pattern ....................***Failed 0.34 sec Start 12: track_origins.pattern 12/49 Test #12: track_origins.pattern .............***Failed 0.34 sec Start 13: fuzz_corpus 13/49 Test #13: fuzz_corpus ....................... Passed 3.56 sec Start 14: fuzz_buffer 14/49 Test #14: fuzz_buffer ....................... Passed 4.62 sec Start 15: fuzz_buffer.replace_buffer 15/49 Test #15: fuzz_buffer.replace_buffer ........ Passed 4.62 sec Start 16: fuzz_buffer.overflow 16/49 Test #16: fuzz_buffer.overflow ..............***Failed 0.34 sec Start 17: fuzz_buffer.mutator.o-b-s-3 17/49 Test #17: fuzz_buffer.mutator.o-b-s-3 ....... Passed 4.59 sec Start 18: fuzz_buffer.mutator.r-b-s-3 18/49 Test #18: fuzz_buffer.mutator.r-b-s-3 ....... Passed 4.63 sec Start 19: fuzz_buffer.mutator.o-b-3 19/49 Test #19: fuzz_buffer.mutator.o-b-3 ......... Passed 4.60 sec Start 20: fuzz_buffer.mutator.r-n 20/49 Test #20: fuzz_buffer.mutator.r-n ........... Passed 4.54 sec Start 21: fuzz_buffer.mutator.random_seed 21/49 Test #21: fuzz_buffer.mutator.random_seed ... Passed 4.57 sec Start 22: fuzz_buffer.one-input 22/49 Test #22: fuzz_buffer.one-input ............. Passed 3.82 sec Start 23: fuzz_buffer.load_input 23/49 Test #23: fuzz_buffer.load_input ............ Passed 3.81 sec Start 24: fuzz_buffer.skip_initial 24/49 Test #24: fuzz_buffer.skip_initial .......... Passed 4.01 sec Start 25: fuzz_buffer.fixed_size 25/49 Test #25: fuzz_buffer.fixed_size ............ Passed 5.36 sec Start 26: fuzz_buffer.offset 26/49 Test #26: fuzz_buffer.offset ................ Passed 5.42 sec Start 27: fuzz_buffer.module_name 27/49 Test #27: fuzz_buffer.module_name ........... Passed 4.58 sec Start 28: fuzz_buffer.dictionary 28/49 Test #28: fuzz_buffer.dictionary ............ Passed 4.20 sec Start 29: fuzz_buffer.cpp 29/49 Test #29: fuzz_buffer.cpp ................... Passed 17.77 sec Start 30: fuzz_custom_mutator 30/49 Test #30: fuzz_custom_mutator ............... Passed 4.57 sec Start 31: drsyscall_test 31/49 Test #31: drsyscall_test .................... Passed 0.22 sec Start 32: strace_test 32/49 Test #32: strace_test ....................... Passed 0.22 sec Start 33: drfuzz_test_empty 33/49 Test #33: drfuzz_test_empty ................. Passed 0.22 sec Start 34: drfuzz_test_mutator 34/49 Test #34: drfuzz_test_mutator ............... Passed 2.38 sec Start 35: drfuzz_test_repeat 35/49 Test #35: drfuzz_test_repeat ................***Failed Start 36: drfuzz_test_segfault 36/49 Test #36: drfuzz_test_segfault .............. Passed 0.20 sec Start 37: drfuzz_test_app_abort 37/49 Test #37: drfuzz_test_app_abort ............. Passed 0.22 sec Start 38: drfuzz_test_no_crash 38/49 Test #38: drfuzz_test_no_crash .............. Passed 0.22 sec Start 39: umbra_test_empty 39/49 Test #39: umbra_test_empty .................. Passed 0.22 sec Start 40: umbra_test_overlap 40/49 Test #40: umbra_test_overlap ................ Passed 0.23 sec Start 41: umbra_test_shadow_mem 41/49 Test #41: umbra_test_shadow_mem ............. Passed 0.30 sec Start 42: umbra_test_insert_app_to_shadow 42/49 Test #42: umbra_test_insert_app_to_shadow ... Passed 0.29 sec Start 43: umbra_test_consistency 43/49 Test #43: umbra_test_consistency ............ Passed 0.30 sec Start 44: umbra_test_allscales 44/49 Test #44: umbra_test_allscales .............. Passed 0.39 sec Start 45: drltrace 45/49 Test #45: drltrace .......................... Passed 0.35 sec Start 46: drltrace_libcalls 46/49 Test #46: drltrace_libcalls ................. Passed 0.36 sec Start 47: drltrace_symargs 47/49 Test #47: drltrace_symargs .................. Passed 0.36 sec Start 48: drltrace_libargs 48/49 Test #48: drltrace_libargs .................. Passed 0.35 sec Start 49: strace_sample 49/49 Test #49: strace_sample ..................... Passed 0.22 sec 88% tests passed, 6 tests failed out of 49

AArch64 port of drmemory. Only contains slowpath support with shared_slowpath off. Pattern mode and fastpath modes are being worked on separately. Currently this build does break some x86 functionality. Depends on: https://github.com/DynamoRIO/dynamorio/tree/mem-ref-for-clean-calls-aarch64/core Current tests we have analysed: Test project /home/grecaw01/APD-testing/drmem-upstream3/drmemory/build Start 1: drmf_proj 1/49 Test #1: drmf_proj ......................... Passed 0.45 sec Start 2: unit_tests 2/49 Test #2: unit_tests ........................ Passed 0.02 sec Start 3: hello 3/49 Test #3: hello ............................. Passed 3.55 sec Start 4: free 4/49 Test #4: free .............................. Passed 3.67 sec Start 5: malloc 5/49 Test #5: malloc ............................ Passed 3.88 sec Start 6: leak_indirect 6/49 Test #6: leak_indirect ..................... Passed 3.52 sec Start 7: patterns 7/49 Test #7: patterns .......................... Passed 3.93 sec Start 8: free.exitcode 8/49 Test #8: free.exitcode ..................... Passed 3.64 sec Start 9: track_origins 9/49 Test #9: track_origins .....................***Failed 0.34 sec Start 10: free.pattern 10/49 Test #10: free.pattern ......................***Failed 0.35 sec Start 11: malloc.pattern 11/49 Test #11: malloc.pattern ....................***Failed 0.34 sec Start 12: track_origins.pattern 12/49 Test #12: track_origins.pattern .............***Failed 0.34 sec Start 13: fuzz_corpus 13/49 Test #13: fuzz_corpus ....................... Passed 3.56 sec Start 14: fuzz_buffer 14/49 Test #14: fuzz_buffer ....................... Passed 4.62 sec Start 15: fuzz_buffer.replace_buffer 15/49 Test #15: fuzz_buffer.replace_buffer ........ Passed 4.62 sec Start 16: fuzz_buffer.overflow 16/49 Test #16: fuzz_buffer.overflow ..............***Failed 0.34 sec Start 17: fuzz_buffer.mutator.o-b-s-3 17/49 Test #17: fuzz_buffer.mutator.o-b-s-3 ....... Passed 4.59 sec Start 18: fuzz_buffer.mutator.r-b-s-3 18/49 Test #18: fuzz_buffer.mutator.r-b-s-3 ....... Passed 4.63 sec Start 19: fuzz_buffer.mutator.o-b-3 19/49 Test #19: fuzz_buffer.mutator.o-b-3 ......... Passed 4.60 sec Start 20: fuzz_buffer.mutator.r-n 20/49 Test #20: fuzz_buffer.mutator.r-n ........... Passed 4.54 sec Start 21: fuzz_buffer.mutator.random_seed 21/49 Test #21: fuzz_buffer.mutator.random_seed ... Passed 4.57 sec Start 22: fuzz_buffer.one-input 22/49 Test #22: fuzz_buffer.one-input ............. Passed 3.82 sec Start 23: fuzz_buffer.load_input 23/49 Test #23: fuzz_buffer.load_input ............ Passed 3.81 sec Start 24: fuzz_buffer.skip_initial 24/49 Test #24: fuzz_buffer.skip_initial .......... Passed 4.01 sec Start 25: fuzz_buffer.fixed_size 25/49 Test #25: fuzz_buffer.fixed_size ............ Passed 5.36 sec Start 26: fuzz_buffer.offset 26/49 Test #26: fuzz_buffer.offset ................ Passed 5.42 sec Start 27: fuzz_buffer.module_name 27/49 Test #27: fuzz_buffer.module_name ........... Passed 4.58 sec Start 28: fuzz_buffer.dictionary 28/49 Test #28: fuzz_buffer.dictionary ............ Passed 4.20 sec Start 29: fuzz_buffer.cpp 29/49 Test #29: fuzz_buffer.cpp ................... Passed 17.77 sec Start 30: fuzz_custom_mutator 30/49 Test #30: fuzz_custom_mutator ............... Passed 4.57 sec Start 31: drsyscall_test 31/49 Test #31: drsyscall_test .................... Passed 0.22 sec Start 32: strace_test 32/49 Test #32: strace_test ....................... Passed 0.22 sec Start 33: drfuzz_test_empty 33/49 Test #33: drfuzz_test_empty ................. Passed 0.22 sec Start 34: drfuzz_test_mutator 34/49 Test #34: drfuzz_test_mutator ............... Passed 2.38 sec Start 35: drfuzz_test_repeat 35/49 Test #35: drfuzz_test_repeat ................***Failed Start 36: drfuzz_test_segfault 36/49 Test #36: drfuzz_test_segfault .............. Passed 0.20 sec Start 37: drfuzz_test_app_abort 37/49 Test #37: drfuzz_test_app_abort ............. Passed 0.22 sec Start 38: drfuzz_test_no_crash 38/49 Test #38: drfuzz_test_no_crash .............. Passed 0.22 sec Start 39: umbra_test_empty 39/49 Test #39: umbra_test_empty .................. Passed 0.22 sec Start 40: umbra_test_overlap 40/49 Test #40: umbra_test_overlap ................ Passed 0.23 sec Start 41: umbra_test_shadow_mem 41/49 Test #41: umbra_test_shadow_mem ............. Passed 0.30 sec Start 42: umbra_test_insert_app_to_shadow 42/49 Test #42: umbra_test_insert_app_to_shadow ... Passed 0.29 sec Start 43: umbra_test_consistency 43/49 Test #43: umbra_test_consistency ............ Passed 0.30 sec Start 44: umbra_test_allscales 44/49 Test #44: umbra_test_allscales .............. Passed 0.39 sec Start 45: drltrace 45/49 Test #45: drltrace .......................... Passed 0.35 sec Start 46: drltrace_libcalls 46/49 Test #46: drltrace_libcalls ................. Passed 0.36 sec Start 47: drltrace_symargs 47/49 Test #47: drltrace_symargs .................. Passed 0.36 sec Start 48: drltrace_libargs 48/49 Test #48: drltrace_libargs .................. Passed 0.35 sec Start 49: strace_sample 49/49 Test #49: strace_sample ..................... Passed 0.22 sec 88% tests passed, 6 tests failed out of 49

derekbruening added Migrated Status-Fixed OpSys-Windows Type-Bug Priority-Low Bug-FalsePositive labels Nov 28, 2014

derekbruening closed this as completed Nov 28, 2014

This was referenced Jan 31, 2015

APP CRASH running graphical program on OSX #1673

Open

CRASH at exit when launched from ConEmu #1675

Closed

derekbruening mentioned this issue Feb 17, 2015

CRASH encoding in-heap xmm shadow write on Windows 8.1 #1680

Closed

pierrejoye mentioned this issue Jan 28, 2016

php.exe crashes under Windows 10 #1854

Closed

alexei37 mentioned this issue Jun 26, 2017

Potential false positives reported by Dr.Memory within Threading Building Blocks (Intel® TBB) #2004

Open

jakka30 mentioned this issue May 21, 2020

Internal crash #2298

Closed

vtorri mentioned this issue Apr 10, 2021

[win10 64 bits] UNINITIALIZED READ with stat64 with code compiled with msys2+mingw-w64 #2402

Open

gregcawthorne mentioned this issue Jun 30, 2021

#i2016 slowpath-aarch64-port inital #2411

Open

yuansunliang1988 mentioned this issue Jun 27, 2024

run error #2501

Open

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

False reports on SystemParametersInfo #10

False reports on SystemParametersInfo #10

derekbruening commented Nov 28, 2014

derekbruening commented Nov 28, 2014

derekbruening commented Nov 28, 2014

derekbruening commented Nov 28, 2014

derekbruening commented Nov 28, 2014

derekbruening commented Nov 28, 2014

derekbruening commented Nov 28, 2014

derekbruening commented Nov 28, 2014

False reports on SystemParametersInfo #10

False reports on SystemParametersInfo #10

Comments

derekbruening commented Nov 28, 2014

derekbruening commented Nov 28, 2014

derekbruening commented Nov 28, 2014

derekbruening commented Nov 28, 2014

derekbruening commented Nov 28, 2014

derekbruening commented Nov 28, 2014

derekbruening commented Nov 28, 2014

derekbruening commented Nov 28, 2014