Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes in computing function endpoints for replication cases #9632

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 10, 2019

Conversation

aparajit-pratap
Copy link
Contributor

@aparajit-pratap aparajit-pratap commented Apr 8, 2019

Purpose

https://jira.autodesk.com/browse/DYN-1759

Declarations

Check these if you believe they are true

  • The code base is in a better state after this PR
  • Is documented according to the standards
  • The level of testing this PR includes is appropriate
  • User facing strings, if any, are extracted into *.resx files
  • All tests pass using the self-service CI.
  • Snapshot of UI changes, if any.
  • Changes to the API follow Semantic Versioning, and are documented in the API Changes document.

Reviewers

@reddyashish

FYIs

(FILL ME IN, Optional) Names of anyone else you wish to be notified of

a = [ 1, 2 ];
b = [[3, 4], [5,9]];
c = b[[true,0]][0..1]; // [[b[true][0], b[true, 1]], [b[0,0], b[0,1]]] => [null, [3, 4]]
test = foo (c, a[0..1]); ";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor change, extra spaces here at the end of the string.

@reddyashish
Copy link
Contributor

@aparajit-pratap Looks good to me.

@reddyashish reddyashish added the LGTM Looks good to me label Apr 8, 2019
a = [ 1, 2 ];
b = [[3, 4], [5,9]];
c = b[[0.1,1.1]][0..1];
test = foo (c, a[0..1]);";
Copy link
Member

@mjkkirschner mjkkirschner Apr 8, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

isn't a[0..1] just equal to a?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes they are same.

@mjkkirschner
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@QilongTang QilongTang merged commit b523caf into DynamoDS:master Apr 10, 2019
@QilongTang
Copy link
Contributor

@aparajit-pratap aparajit-pratap deleted the DYN-1759 branch April 10, 2019 14:44
reddyashish added a commit to reddyashish/Dynamo that referenced this pull request May 21, 2019
QilongTang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 28, 2019
* Cherry-picking #9388 into 2.0.3

* Cherry-picking #9559 into 2.0.3

* Cherry-picking #9578 into 2.0.3

* cherry-picking #9632 into 2.0.3

* cherry-picking #9408 into 2.0.3

* cherry-picking #9441 into 2.0.3

* Adding gradient.png for the Test_PerforationsByImage test.

This was missed while cherrypicking #9441

* Removing DSCoreDataTests.cs as this was the test fixture was introduced in a different commit and is not needed here.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
LGTM Looks good to me
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants