Flaml meets DoubleML - Comparing AutoML tuning #198
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In this notebook, we compare AutoML tuning methods using the FLAML library. We generate synthetic data with the make_plr_CCDDHNR2018 function. The analysis includes:
We assess model performance using the DoubleML framework, focusing on metrics like Mean Squared Error (MSE) and coefficients with confidence intervals. Results are saved and visualized to compare the effectiveness of each tuning approach.