Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

User Management #175

Open
skos-ninja opened this issue Jul 11, 2015 · 10 comments
Open

User Management #175

skos-ninja opened this issue Jul 11, 2015 · 10 comments

Comments

@skos-ninja
Copy link
Member

skos-ninja commented Jul 11, 2015

To create a better way to create users and to be able to manage them better a system will need to be made. This issue should also be used to be referenced by others for us to know what should be added to the system

@DefProc
Copy link

DefProc commented Jul 14, 2015

Is this related to #45 or to the doorbot setup?

@skos-ninja skos-ninja changed the title User Managment User Management Jul 18, 2015
@skos-ninja
Copy link
Member Author

Yes it's related to both really, it's also for helpful for any issues that arise in which we think it would be good to include that in the User Management.

@amcewen
Copy link
Member

amcewen commented Apr 6, 2016

We should have a look at https://www.fab-manager.com/?lang=en to see if it covers the sort of things we want from an online system, and then think about switching over to that (and extending it to support the other things we'd want if need be)

@amcewen
Copy link
Member

amcewen commented Apr 13, 2016

I wonder if fab-manager has somewhere that we can store the organisers-only info (passwords, process, etc.) that's currently the remaining bit of info on the wiki hosted on my VPS (so we can move it onto DoES-controlled infrastructure, as per #18 :-) Don't suppose you noticed anything along those lines when you were having a poke around @DoESsean?

@DoESsean
Copy link
Contributor

I didn't, but then I wasn't going into any great depth. I can have a more
detailed look today.

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Adrian McEwen [email protected]
wrote:

I wonder if fab-manager has somewhere that we can store the
organisers-only info (passwords, process, etc.) that's currently the
remaining bit of info on the wiki hosted on my VPS (so we can move it onto
DoES-controlled infrastructure, as per #18
#18 :-) Don't
suppose you noticed anything along those lines when you were having a poke
around @DoESsean https://github.com/DoESsean?


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#175 (comment)

@jamieisboss
Copy link

The database for that is in postgres, if it has LDAP and Radius plugins, you'll save a lot of time as that can pretty much do network access, door access, file server/printer resources, github integration and all kinds of other things but they're the two things you really want for user management, then anything else to plug into them

@JimSparrow
Copy link

I think this is now all on Gitlabs ...

Sent from my Asus P027 using FastHub

@amcewen
Copy link
Member

amcewen commented Jul 22, 2017

This isn't on Gitlabs, it's still something we haven't got a good system for. I've got a fabmanager install now that we can poke around with and see how to modify to do what we need for this (and some of the other issues on administering DoES, members, bookings, etc.).

It'd be good to find a few people who want to help specify and build it - so if anyone wants to do(/learn) some Ruby coding, let me know.

I'll be leading the team pulling that together, but am pretty overloaded right now so it'll likely be a few weeks before there's much movement on it.

@amcewen amcewen reopened this Jul 22, 2017
@skos-ninja
Copy link
Member Author

@amcewen happy to help when the time comes

@amcewen
Copy link
Member

amcewen commented Nov 6, 2017

I've killed off the FabManager install for now, as it was costing us money to keep running and it'll be nearer/after the move before I'll be able to do any more on it. I've stashed the config files, etc. in somewhere-really-safe on Gitlab, so resurrecting it should be easier.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants