Add support for multiple data types

[edenhaus]

Restructure all commands and messages to support multiple data types.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #292 (a0f7051) into main (15b97b3) will increase coverage by 0.68%.
The diff coverage is 98.42%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #292      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.25%   73.93%   +0.68%     
==========================================
  Files          49       51       +2     
  Lines        2131     2191      +60     
  Branches      422      438      +16     
==========================================
+ Hits         1561     1620      +59     
- Misses        520      521       +1     
  Partials       50       50              

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
deebot_client/commands/json/const.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
deebot_client/commands/json/play_sound.py	80.00% <ø> (ø)
deebot_client/commands/json/relocation.py	80.00% <ø> (ø)
deebot_client/vacuum_bot.py	74.48% <50.00%> (ø)
deebot_client/message.py	85.04% <89.47%> (-0.22%)	⬇️
deebot_client/command.py	90.36% <100.00%> (+0.61%)	⬆️
deebot_client/commands/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
deebot_client/commands/json/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
deebot_client/commands/json/advanced_mode.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
deebot_client/commands/json/battery.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 29 more

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[edenhaus]

@sandervankasteel What do you think about this change?

The implementation of which model supports what is coming in a follow-up PR.

[sandervankasteel]

@sandervankasteel What do you think about this change?

The implementation of which model supports what is coming in a follow-up PR.

For an initial base of the new architecture, I can definitely see this working! 😄

[sandervankasteel]

@edenhaus what the your proposed action plan for this?

Do you wanna merge this PR + plus the functionality for model specific implementations first and then I update my PR for the new functionality? Or would be better for me to already start implemented the XML commands based on this PR?

[edenhaus]

@sandervankasteel I have created the new branch dev, use this branch as base for your changes. You can start to implemented the new commands 😊

In the meantime I work on the model specific support PR