feat(jellyfish-transaction, jellyfish-transaction-builder): Add futureswap dftxs

[surangap]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Add futureswap and withdrawfutureswap dftxs

Which issue(s) does this PR fixes?:

Fixes part of #1268

Additional comments?:

[codeclimate]

Code Climate has analyzed commit 04001e7 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for jellyfish-defi ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	04001e7
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/jellyfish-defi/deploys/625441265d50f3000895e864
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1329--jellyfish-defi.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1329 (04001e7) into main (d7819a5) will increase coverage by 4.61%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1329      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.39%   88.01%   +4.61%     
==========================================
  Files         335      347      +12     
  Lines        9737    10027     +290     
  Branches     1195     1224      +29     
==========================================
+ Hits         8120     8825     +705     
+ Misses       1517     1127     -390     
+ Partials      100       75      -25     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...transaction-builder/src/txn/txn_builder_account.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (+40.00%)	⬆️
...ages/jellyfish-transaction/src/script/dftx/dftx.ts	98.52% <100.00%> (+1.51%)	⬆️
...lyfish-transaction/src/script/dftx/dftx_account.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ckages/jellyfish-transaction/src/script/mapping.ts	98.02% <100.00%> (+10.02%)	⬆️
...ners/src/containers/RegTestContainer/Persistent.ts	11.11% <0.00%> (-81.49%)	⬇️
...rc/module.api/interceptors/response.interceptor.ts	66.66% <0.00%> (-25.00%)	⬇️
apps/whale/src/module.api/loan.vault.service.ts	62.50% <0.00%> (-24.11%)	⬇️
...ages/jellyfish-api-core/src/category/governance.ts	90.90% <0.00%> (-9.10%)	⬇️
...c/module.api/interceptors/exception.interceptor.ts	39.28% <0.00%> (-7.15%)	⬇️
packages/jellyfish-api-jsonrpc/src/index.ts	97.67% <0.00%> (-2.33%)	⬇️
... and 73 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d7819a5...04001e7. Read the comment docs.

[github-actions]

Docker build preview for jellyfish/apps is ready!

Built with commit a8d1aa9

• ghcr.io/defich/legacy-api:pr-1329
• ghcr.io/defich/ocean-api:pr-1329
• ghcr.io/defich/playground-api:pr-1329
• ghcr.io/defich/status-api:pr-1329

[jingyi2811]

This PR is good to be merged to main.

Before merging, it is good to add this test item
should create multiple dtoken to dusd futureswaps within the same block
(See futureswap.test.ts)

Maybe @surangap you have good reason to remove this in your dftx test file, kindly advise

[surangap]

This PR is good to be merged to main.

Before merging, it is good to add this test item should create multiple dtoken to dusd futureswaps within the same block (See futureswap.test.ts)

Maybe @surangap you have good reason to remove this in your dftx test file, kindly advise

yeah two reasons

1. sendTransaction() has a generate(1) inside it. But we can modify it.
2. Also sendrawtransaction RPC only supports sending only one tx at a time. so no multiple tx send at the same time.
3. Currently, fundAddress() also generates blocks inside. This is for the fees.

We need to update the above👆 functions to have it done within one block and check.

[surangap]

This PR is good to be merged to main.
Before merging, it is good to add this test item should create multiple dtoken to dusd futureswaps within the same block (See futureswap.test.ts)
Maybe @surangap you have good reason to remove this in your dftx test file, kindly advise

yeah two reasons

1. sendTransaction() has a generate(1) inside it. But we can modify it.
2. Also sendrawtransaction RPC only supports sending only one tx at a time. so no multiple tx send at the same time.
3. Currently, fundAddress() also generates blocks inside. This is for the fees.

We need to update the above👆 functions to have it done within one block and check.

@jingyi2811
btw i have the half-baked test case for this. Currently facing some issues with funding for txs fees. Coz with our current mock provider, one utxo can be used only once for some reason. I remember try digging it in the past. I guess have to continue doing it.
anw let's merge this since downstream require a release.
will add this test later.
#1346