-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Small fixes for .NET 9 #6277
Small fixes for .NET 9 #6277
Conversation
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 451303 Passed, 2725 Skipped, 19h 20m 33.85s Total Time |
Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits: Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:
Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard. Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph). gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (6277) - mean (71ms) : 64, 78
. : milestone, 71,
master - mean (72ms) : 64, 80
. : milestone, 72,
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (6277) - mean (1,107ms) : 1089, 1125
. : milestone, 1107,
master - mean (1,112ms) : 1091, 1134
. : milestone, 1112,
gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (6277) - mean (108ms) : 104, 111
. : milestone, 108,
master - mean (109ms) : 106, 112
. : milestone, 109,
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (6277) - mean (766ms) : 751, 780
. : milestone, 766,
master - mean (770ms) : 757, 782
. : milestone, 770,
gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (6277) - mean (91ms) : 89, 94
. : milestone, 91,
master - mean (93ms) : 91, 95
. : milestone, 93,
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (6277) - mean (718ms) : 703, 732
. : milestone, 718,
master - mean (724ms) : 709, 740
. : milestone, 724,
gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (6277) - mean (192ms) : 183, 201
. : milestone, 192,
master - mean (190ms) : 185, 195
. : milestone, 190,
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (6277) - mean (1,228ms) : 1205, 1250
. : milestone, 1228,
master - mean (1,229ms) : 1205, 1252
. : milestone, 1229,
gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (6277) - mean (277ms) : 273, 281
. : milestone, 277,
master - mean (277ms) : 273, 281
. : milestone, 277,
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (6277) - mean (945ms) : 927, 964
. : milestone, 945,
master - mean (947ms) : 930, 963
. : milestone, 947,
gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (6277) - mean (265ms) : 261, 269
. : milestone, 265,
master - mean (265ms) : 260, 269
. : milestone, 265,
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (6277) - mean (920ms) : 898, 943
. : milestone, 920,
master - mean (928ms) : 907, 949
. : milestone, 928,
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Throughput/Crank Report ⚡Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits: Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red. Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards! gantt
title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
section Baseline
This PR (6277) (11.195M) : 0, 11195009
master (11.092M) : 0, 11091647
benchmarks/2.9.0 (11.033M) : 0, 11032866
section Automatic
This PR (6277) (7.117M) : 0, 7117447
master (7.247M) : 0, 7247456
benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.786M) : 0, 7785853
section Trace stats
master (7.567M) : 0, 7566624
section Manual
master (11.125M) : 0, 11125038
section Manual + Automatic
This PR (6277) (6.569M) : 0, 6569139
master (6.734M) : 0, 6733580
section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
master (10.150M) : 0, 10149788
gantt
title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
section Baseline
This PR (6277) (9.656M) : 0, 9656254
master (9.672M) : 0, 9672005
benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.495M) : 0, 9494821
section Automatic
This PR (6277) (6.252M) : 0, 6251777
master (6.434M) : 0, 6433517
section Trace stats
master (6.711M) : 0, 6710571
section Manual
master (9.432M) : 0, 9431949
section Manual + Automatic
This PR (6277) (5.809M) : 0, 5809064
master (5.956M) : 0, 5955854
section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
master (8.885M) : 0, 8884829
gantt
title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
section Baseline
This PR (6277) (9.969M) : 0, 9969138
master (9.850M) : 0, 9849596
benchmarks/2.9.0 (10.020M) : 0, 10019592
section Automatic
This PR (6277) (6.747M) : 0, 6747365
master (6.340M) : 0, 6339934
benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.255M) : 0, 7255257
section Trace stats
master (6.803M) : 0, 6803435
section Manual
master (9.774M) : 0, 9774066
section Manual + Automatic
This PR (6277) (6.321M) : 0, 6321137
master (0.010M) : 0, 10074
section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
master (9.121M) : 0, 9121169
|
Summary of changes
Reason for change
#6265 introduced .NET 9 support, but the trimming test wasn't working with rc2, so temporarily skipped it.
Also, I broke the GitLab build 🙈
Implementation details
Fix the gitlab build, unskip the test because it works with the GA release
Test coverage
This is the test
Other details
Requires 👇
I tried to skip the x86 .NET Ready2Run manual instrumentation test, but there's still something weird going on there with it looking for the dotnet runtime in the "wrong" place. I'm 99% sure this is purely a build-related issue, so I don't have much impetuous flogging it much more at this point... 🙈