Fix using the wrong pool for smoke tests #6196

andrewlock · 2024-10-24T13:16:57Z

Summary of changes

Use azure-windows-scale-set-2 instead of azure-windows-scale-set

Reason for change

This was an oversight way back when we updated. It shouldn't matter, it's just sub-optimal.

Implementation details

Fix the pool we use

andrewlock · 2024-10-24T13:52:48Z

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6196) - mean (71ms)  : 68, 74
     .   : milestone, 71,
    master - mean (70ms)  : 68, 72
     .   : milestone, 70,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6196) - mean (1,120ms)  : 1095, 1145
     .   : milestone, 1120,
    master - mean (1,112ms)  : 1086, 1139
     .   : milestone, 1112,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6196) - mean (109ms)  : 106, 112
     .   : milestone, 109,
    master - mean (109ms)  : 106, 112
     .   : milestone, 109,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6196) - mean (773ms)  : 755, 791
     .   : milestone, 773,
    master - mean (773ms)  : 760, 787
     .   : milestone, 773,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6196) - mean (93ms)  : 90, 96
     .   : milestone, 93,
    master - mean (93ms)  : 89, 96
     .   : milestone, 93,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6196) - mean (728ms)  : 705, 751
     .   : milestone, 728,
    master - mean (727ms)  : 714, 740
     .   : milestone, 727,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6196) - mean (190ms)  : 187, 193
     .   : milestone, 190,
    master - mean (190ms)  : 188, 192
     .   : milestone, 190,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6196) - mean (1,201ms)  : 1178, 1224
     .   : milestone, 1201,
    master - mean (1,202ms)  : 1176, 1227
     .   : milestone, 1202,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6196) - mean (275ms)  : 271, 279
     .   : milestone, 275,
    master - mean (276ms)  : 270, 282
     .   : milestone, 276,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6196) - mean (947ms)  : 929, 966
     .   : milestone, 947,
    master - mean (945ms)  : 925, 965
     .   : milestone, 945,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6196) - mean (264ms)  : 261, 267
     .   : milestone, 264,
    master - mean (265ms)  : 261, 270
     .   : milestone, 265,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6196) - mean (923ms)  : 904, 943
     .   : milestone, 923,
    master - mean (926ms)  : 909, 944
     .   : milestone, 926,

datadog-ddstaging · 2024-10-24T14:21:14Z

Datadog Report

Branch report: andrew/ci/fix-using-wrong-pool
Commit report: 38dd10a
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet

✅ 0 Failed, 368041 Passed, 2098 Skipped, 15h 17m 53.08s Total Time

andrewlock · 2024-10-24T14:50:35Z

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #6196 compared to master:

1 benchmarks are slower, with geometric mean 1.149
All benchmarks have the same allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Gen 2	Allocated
master	`StartStopWithChild`	net6.0	7.78μs	43.8ns	291ns	0.0152	0.00381	0	5.43 KB
master	`StartStopWithChild`	netcoreapp3.1	9.8μs	55.3ns	391ns	0.024	0.00959	0	5.62 KB
master	`StartStopWithChild`	net472	16.4μs	71.6ns	277ns	1.05	0.345	0.0904	6.07 KB
#6196	`StartStopWithChild`	net6.0	7.64μs	43.6ns	311ns	0.0108	0.00721	0	5.43 KB
#6196	`StartStopWithChild`	netcoreapp3.1	10.3μs	55.7ns	315ns	0.0148	0.00492	0	5.62 KB
#6196	`StartStopWithChild`	net472	16.1μs	39.6ns	153ns	1.02	0.298	0.0967	6.06 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	465μs	416ns	1.61μs	0	2.7 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	642μs	434ns	1.63μs	0	2.7 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	845μs	553ns	2.14μs	0.422	3.3 KB
#6196	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	494μs	418ns	1.56μs	0	2.7 KB
#6196	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	663μs	434ns	1.68μs	0	2.7 KB
#6196	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	835μs	824ns	3.19μs	0.414	3.3 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`SendRequest`	net6.0	201μs	1.18μs	11μs	0.2	18.45 KB
master	`SendRequest`	netcoreapp3.1	222μs	1.29μs	11.9μs	0.241	20.61 KB
master	`SendRequest`	net472	0.00047ns	0.000285ns	0.00103ns	0	0 b
#6196	`SendRequest`	net6.0	201μs	1.17μs	10.1μs	0.203	18.45 KB
#6196	`SendRequest`	netcoreapp3.1	226μs	1.32μs	12.3μs	0.207	20.61 KB
#6196	`SendRequest`	net472	4.67E‑05ns	4.67E‑05ns	0.000175ns	0	0 b

Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Gen 2	Allocated
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	556μs	2.99μs	15.5μs	0.576	0	0	41.6 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	690μs	3.74μs	22.1μs	0.343	0	0	41.66 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	837μs	3.15μs	12.2μs	8.69	2.48	0.414	53.35 KB
#6196	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	588μs	3.25μs	20.3μs	0.579	0	0	41.74 KB
#6196	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	678μs	3.64μs	19.3μs	0.342	0	0	41.69 KB
#6196	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	878μs	4.32μs	18.8μs	8.42	2.66	0.443	53.28 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #6196

Benchmark	diff/base	Base Median (ns)	Diff Median (ns)	Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark.ExecuteNonQuery‑net6.0	1.149	1,272.37	1,461.38

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net6.0	1.27μs	1.43ns	5.34ns	0.0141	1.02 KB
master	`ExecuteNonQuery`	netcoreapp3.1	1.71μs	1.28ns	4.97ns	0.0138	1.02 KB
master	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net472	2.1μs	2.75ns	10.3ns	0.157	987 B
#6196	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net6.0	1.46μs	0.695ns	2.51ns	0.0142	1.02 KB
#6196	`ExecuteNonQuery`	netcoreapp3.1	1.73μs	1.27ns	4.9ns	0.014	1.02 KB
#6196	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net472	2.08μs	1.33ns	4.97ns	0.156	987 B

Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`CallElasticsearch`	net6.0	1.25μs	0.38ns	1.42ns	0.0137	976 B
master	`CallElasticsearch`	netcoreapp3.1	1.5μs	0.514ns	1.85ns	0.0128	976 B
master	`CallElasticsearch`	net472	2.49μs	2.71ns	9.75ns	0.157	995 B
master	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net6.0	1.3μs	1.07ns	4.15ns	0.013	952 B
master	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.65μs	0.635ns	2.38ns	0.0141	1.02 KB
master	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net472	2.42μs	1.04ns	3.74ns	0.167	1.05 KB
#6196	`CallElasticsearch`	net6.0	1.22μs	0.539ns	2.02ns	0.0134	976 B
#6196	`CallElasticsearch`	netcoreapp3.1	1.52μs	0.717ns	2.78ns	0.0129	976 B
#6196	`CallElasticsearch`	net472	2.43μs	1.21ns	4.19ns	0.158	995 B
#6196	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net6.0	1.29μs	0.55ns	2.13ns	0.0129	952 B
#6196	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.64μs	2.36ns	9.12ns	0.0136	1.02 KB
#6196	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net472	2.58μs	1.83ns	7.07ns	0.166	1.05 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`ExecuteAsync`	net6.0	1.25μs	0.609ns	2.28ns	0.0131	952 B
master	`ExecuteAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.69μs	0.968ns	3.62ns	0.0125	952 B
master	`ExecuteAsync`	net472	1.88μs	1.44ns	5.57ns	0.144	915 B
#6196	`ExecuteAsync`	net6.0	1.18μs	0.473ns	1.83ns	0.0131	952 B
#6196	`ExecuteAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.67μs	0.757ns	2.83ns	0.0125	952 B
#6196	`ExecuteAsync`	net472	1.88μs	0.242ns	0.905ns	0.145	915 B

Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`SendAsync`	net6.0	4.1μs	1.11ns	4.31ns	0.0308	2.22 KB
master	`SendAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	5.18μs	8.15ns	31.6ns	0.0361	2.76 KB
master	`SendAsync`	net472	7.78μs	3.23ns	12.5ns	0.498	3.15 KB
#6196	`SendAsync`	net6.0	4.22μs	1.84ns	6.88ns	0.0311	2.22 KB
#6196	`SendAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	5.04μs	4.42ns	17.1ns	0.0378	2.76 KB
#6196	`SendAsync`	net472	7.9μs	2.77ns	10.7ns	0.499	3.15 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	1.57μs	0.707ns	2.65ns	0.0227	1.64 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	2.16μs	1.09ns	4.06ns	0.0226	1.64 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	2.61μs	0.957ns	3.7ns	0.249	1.57 KB
#6196	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	1.61μs	1.27ns	4.73ns	0.0227	1.64 KB
#6196	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	2.18μs	1.76ns	6.6ns	0.0218	1.64 KB
#6196	`EnrichedLog`	net472	2.57μs	1.04ns	3.74ns	0.249	1.57 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	114μs	237ns	919ns	0.0574	0	4.28 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	120μs	245ns	948ns	0.0599	0	4.28 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	150μs	191ns	716ns	0.678	0.226	4.46 KB
#6196	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	116μs	304ns	1.18μs	0.058	0	4.28 KB
#6196	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	122μs	165ns	640ns	0.0609	0	4.28 KB
#6196	`EnrichedLog`	net472	152μs	114ns	427ns	0.683	0.228	4.46 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	3.14μs	2.34ns	9.05ns	0.0298	2.2 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	4.09μs	1.23ns	4.75ns	0.0287	2.2 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.74μs	0.811ns	3.14ns	0.321	2.02 KB
#6196	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	3.03μs	1.18ns	4.57ns	0.0302	2.2 KB
#6196	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	4.1μs	1.8ns	6.98ns	0.0285	2.2 KB
#6196	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.72μs	1.34ns	5.18ns	0.319	2.02 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`SendReceive`	net6.0	1.36μs	1.64ns	6.35ns	0.0162	1.14 KB
master	`SendReceive`	netcoreapp3.1	1.78μs	0.85ns	3.18ns	0.0151	1.14 KB
master	`SendReceive`	net472	2.13μs	2.07ns	8.01ns	0.183	1.16 KB
#6196	`SendReceive`	net6.0	1.48μs	1.14ns	4.4ns	0.0162	1.14 KB
#6196	`SendReceive`	netcoreapp3.1	1.74μs	1.04ns	3.75ns	0.0157	1.14 KB
#6196	`SendReceive`	net472	2.03μs	0.766ns	2.97ns	0.183	1.16 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	2.59μs	0.724ns	2.71ns	0.022	1.6 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	4.04μs	0.823ns	2.85ns	0.0223	1.65 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.28μs	2.59ns	9.71ns	0.322	2.04 KB
#6196	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	2.72μs	0.994ns	3.85ns	0.0218	1.6 KB
#6196	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	3.9μs	2.22ns	8.58ns	0.0213	1.65 KB
#6196	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.45μs	4.79ns	17.3ns	0.323	2.04 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`StartFinishSpan`	net6.0	401ns	0.253ns	0.981ns	0.00803	576 B
master	`StartFinishSpan`	netcoreapp3.1	597ns	0.443ns	1.72ns	0.00787	576 B
master	`StartFinishSpan`	net472	669ns	0.3ns	1.16ns	0.0916	578 B
master	`StartFinishScope`	net6.0	495ns	1.9ns	7.1ns	0.00966	696 B
master	`StartFinishScope`	netcoreapp3.1	742ns	0.455ns	1.76ns	0.00949	696 B
master	`StartFinishScope`	net472	880ns	0.714ns	2.67ns	0.105	658 B
#6196	`StartFinishSpan`	net6.0	399ns	0.107ns	0.413ns	0.00799	576 B
#6196	`StartFinishSpan`	netcoreapp3.1	568ns	0.275ns	1.06ns	0.00773	576 B
#6196	`StartFinishSpan`	net472	708ns	0.259ns	0.934ns	0.0916	578 B
#6196	`StartFinishScope`	net6.0	507ns	0.0882ns	0.342ns	0.00982	696 B
#6196	`StartFinishScope`	netcoreapp3.1	776ns	0.456ns	1.77ns	0.0093	696 B
#6196	`StartFinishScope`	net472	894ns	0.608ns	2.35ns	0.105	658 B

Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net6.0	652ns	0.805ns	3.12ns	0.00983	696 B
master	`RunOnMethodBegin`	netcoreapp3.1	965ns	0.919ns	3.56ns	0.00939	696 B
master	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net472	1.13μs	1.11ns	4.3ns	0.104	658 B
#6196	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net6.0	691ns	0.394ns	1.53ns	0.00966	696 B
#6196	`RunOnMethodBegin`	netcoreapp3.1	964ns	0.505ns	1.96ns	0.00922	696 B
#6196	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net472	1.15μs	0.207ns	0.774ns	0.104	658 B

andrewlock · 2024-10-24T15:43:22Z

Throughput/Crank Report ⚡

Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits:

Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards!

gantt
    title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6196) (11.199M)   : 0, 11199457
    master (11.274M)   : 0, 11274027
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (11.081M)   : 0, 11080577

    section Automatic
    This PR (6196) (7.434M)   : 0, 7434345
    master (7.426M)   : 0, 7425892
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.732M)   : 0, 7732233

    section Trace stats
    master (7.675M)   : 0, 7674910

    section Manual
    master (11.118M)   : 0, 11117646

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6196) (6.854M)   : 0, 6853515
    master (6.861M)   : 0, 6861358

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (10.287M)   : 0, 10287259

gantt
    title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6196) (9.702M)   : 0, 9701631
    master (9.384M)   : 0, 9383676
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.798M)   : 0, 9798067

    section Automatic
    This PR (6196) (6.496M)   : 0, 6496080
    master (6.570M)   : 0, 6570004

    section Trace stats
    master (6.840M)   : 0, 6839824

    section Manual
    master (9.309M)   : 0, 9309037

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6196) (6.061M)   : 0, 6060618
    master (6.074M)   : 0, 6073870

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (8.865M)   : 0, 8864615

gantt
    title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6196) (10.034M)   : 0, 10033820
    master (9.946M)   : 0, 9946424
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (10.067M)   : 0, 10067315

    section Automatic
    This PR (6196) (6.486M)   : 0, 6486002
    master (6.353M)   : 0, 6353030
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.552M)   : 0, 7552193

    section Trace stats
    master (7.199M)   : 0, 7199204

    section Manual
    master (9.594M)   : 0, 9593813

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6196) (5.929M)   : 0, 5929337
    master (5.983M)   : 0, 5982831

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (9.232M)   : 0, 9232243

Fix using the wrong pool

38dd10a

andrewlock added the area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages label Oct 24, 2024

andrewlock requested a review from a team as a code owner October 24, 2024 13:16

kevingosse approved these changes Oct 25, 2024

View reviewed changes

andrewlock merged commit b80c0cf into master Oct 25, 2024
75 checks passed

andrewlock deleted the andrew/ci/fix-using-wrong-pool branch October 25, 2024 16:38

github-actions bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Oct 25, 2024

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Fix using the wrong pool for smoke tests #6196

Fix using the wrong pool for smoke tests #6196

andrewlock commented Oct 24, 2024

andrewlock commented Oct 24, 2024

datadog-ddstaging bot commented Oct 24, 2024 •

edited

Loading

andrewlock commented Oct 24, 2024

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Slower ⚠️ in #6196

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

andrewlock commented Oct 24, 2024

Fix using the wrong pool for smoke tests #6196

Fix using the wrong pool for smoke tests #6196

Conversation

andrewlock commented Oct 24, 2024

Summary of changes

Reason for change

Implementation details

andrewlock commented Oct 24, 2024

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

datadog-ddstaging bot commented Oct 24, 2024 • edited Loading

Datadog Report

andrewlock commented Oct 24, 2024

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmark details

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Slower ⚠️ in #6196

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

andrewlock commented Oct 24, 2024

Throughput/Crank Report ⚡

datadog-ddstaging bot commented Oct 24, 2024 •

edited

Loading