Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make DD_TRACE_<INTEGRATION>_ENABLED Case Insensitive #6175

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 1, 2024

Conversation

link04
Copy link
Contributor

@link04 link04 commented Oct 21, 2024

Summary of changes

Added a option to check for upper cased integration names and moved the case sensitive option as fallback 1.

Reason for change

Currently for Linux DD_TRACE_<INTEGRATION>_ENABLED needs to have an integration name that matches the name's casing on the existing dictionary we check but need to make it case insensitive like all other languages:

https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMAPI-476

Implementation details

Test coverage

Other details

@github-actions github-actions bot added the area:tracer The core tracer library (Datadog.Trace, does not include OpenTracing, native code, or integrations) label Oct 21, 2024
@datadog-ddstaging
Copy link

datadog-ddstaging bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: maximo/consistent-integrations-enabled-casing
Commit report: 3bc695e
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet

✅ 0 Failed, 369396 Passed, 2087 Skipped, 15h 4m 19.8s Total Time

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

andrewlock commented Oct 21, 2024

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6175) - mean (71ms)  : 68, 73
     .   : milestone, 71,
    master - mean (70ms)  : 68, 73
     .   : milestone, 70,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6175) - mean (1,117ms)  : 1096, 1139
     .   : milestone, 1117,
    master - mean (1,117ms)  : 1095, 1139
     .   : milestone, 1117,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6175) - mean (110ms)  : 106, 113
     .   : milestone, 110,
    master - mean (111ms)  : 107, 114
     .   : milestone, 111,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6175) - mean (777ms)  : 763, 791
     .   : milestone, 777,
    master - mean (777ms)  : 762, 791
     .   : milestone, 777,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6175) - mean (94ms)  : 90, 97
     .   : milestone, 94,
    master - mean (94ms)  : 90, 97
     .   : milestone, 94,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6175) - mean (734ms)  : 713, 755
     .   : milestone, 734,
    master - mean (734ms)  : 717, 751
     .   : milestone, 734,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6175) - mean (190ms)  : 187, 193
     .   : milestone, 190,
    master - mean (191ms)  : 187, 194
     .   : milestone, 191,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6175) - mean (1,208ms)  : 1178, 1238
     .   : milestone, 1208,
    master - mean (1,204ms)  : 1177, 1232
     .   : milestone, 1204,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6175) - mean (277ms)  : 272, 282
     .   : milestone, 277,
    master - mean (275ms)  : 270, 281
     .   : milestone, 275,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6175) - mean (950ms)  : 935, 965
     .   : milestone, 950,
    master - mean (948ms)  : 927, 969
     .   : milestone, 948,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6175) - mean (266ms)  : 261, 270
     .   : milestone, 266,
    master - mean (265ms)  : 260, 269
     .   : milestone, 265,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6175) - mean (926ms)  : 906, 946
     .   : milestone, 926,
    master - mean (929ms)  : 912, 946
     .   : milestone, 929,

Loading

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

andrewlock commented Oct 21, 2024

Throughput/Crank Report ⚡

Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits:

Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards!

gantt
    title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6175) (11.175M)   : 0, 11174514
    master (11.239M)   : 0, 11238698
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (11.081M)   : 0, 11080577

    section Automatic
    This PR (6175) (7.290M)   : 0, 7290358
    master (7.276M)   : 0, 7276283
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.732M)   : 0, 7732233

    section Trace stats
    master (7.623M)   : 0, 7622719

    section Manual
    master (11.047M)   : 0, 11046529

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6175) (6.836M)   : 0, 6836200
    master (6.860M)   : 0, 6859678

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (10.213M)   : 0, 10212915

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6175) (9.538M)   : 0, 9538099
    master (9.437M)   : 0, 9436619
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.798M)   : 0, 9798067

    section Automatic
    This PR (6175) (6.425M)   : 0, 6425356
    master (6.727M)   : 0, 6727464

    section Trace stats
    master (6.723M)   : 0, 6723131

    section Manual
    master (9.372M)   : 0, 9371618

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6175) (6.038M)   : 0, 6038035
    master (6.063M)   : 0, 6063264

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (8.797M)   : 0, 8796790

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6175) (10.151M)   : 0, 10150797
    master (10.059M)   : 0, 10059432
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (10.067M)   : 0, 10067315

    section Automatic
    This PR (6175) (6.635M)   : 0, 6635381
    master (6.455M)   : 0, 6454669
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.552M)   : 0, 7552193

    section Trace stats
    master (7.193M)   : 0, 7192976

    section Manual
    master (9.914M)   : 0, 9914007

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6175) (6.382M)   : 0, 6382026
    master (6.023M)   : 0, 6022873

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (9.155M)   : 0, 9155421

Loading

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

andrewlock commented Oct 22, 2024

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #6175 compared to master:

  • 2 benchmarks are faster, with geometric mean 1.114
  • All benchmarks have the same allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

  • Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartStopWithChild net6.0 7.7μs 44.5ns 378ns 0.0151 0.00756 0 5.43 KB
master StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 9.91μs 54.8ns 338ns 0.0196 0.00979 0 5.61 KB
master StartStopWithChild net472 16.4μs 58.8ns 228ns 1 0.3 0.081 6.06 KB
#6175 StartStopWithChild net6.0 7.88μs 44.8ns 314ns 0.0188 0.00752 0 5.43 KB
#6175 StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 9.68μs 48.5ns 233ns 0.0242 0.00968 0 5.62 KB
#6175 StartStopWithChild net472 16.1μs 38.5ns 144ns 1.02 0.32 0.104 6.07 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 492μs 477ns 1.85μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 660μs 300ns 1.12μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 838μs 611ns 2.28μs 0.417 0 0 3.3 KB
#6175 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 489μs 410ns 1.54μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#6175 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 660μs 278ns 1.04μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#6175 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 844μs 424ns 1.64μs 0.419 0 0 3.3 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendRequest net6.0 214μs 1.25μs 12.1μs 0.218 0 0 18.45 KB
master SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 241μs 1.37μs 10.5μs 0.236 0 0 20.61 KB
master SendRequest net472 0.00301ns 0.0011ns 0.00426ns 0 0 0 0 b
#6175 SendRequest net6.0 207μs 1.19μs 9.99μs 0.217 0 0 18.45 KB
#6175 SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 238μs 1.34μs 12.2μs 0.243 0 0 20.61 KB
#6175 SendRequest net472 0.00118ns 0.000469ns 0.00182ns 0 0 0 0 b
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 616μs 3.53μs 25.4μs 0.625 0 0 41.65 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 745μs 3.82μs 19.1μs 0.342 0 0 41.77 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 926μs 4.67μs 20.4μs 8.4 2.33 0.466 53.33 KB
#6175 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 593μs 2.45μs 8.82μs 0.595 0 0 41.57 KB
#6175 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 674μs 3.39μs 16.3μs 0.343 0 0 41.68 KB
#6175 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 901μs 3.77μs 13.6μs 8.36 2.64 0.44 53.34 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.3μs 1.29ns 4.98ns 0.0143 0 0 1.02 KB
master ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.77μs 5.81ns 21ns 0.0139 0 0 1.02 KB
master ExecuteNonQuery net472 2.09μs 1.33ns 5.16ns 0.156 0.00105 0 987 B
#6175 ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.37μs 1.43ns 5.55ns 0.0143 0 0 1.02 KB
#6175 ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.71μs 1.79ns 6.93ns 0.0138 0 0 1.02 KB
#6175 ExecuteNonQuery net472 2.04μs 2.57ns 9.97ns 0.156 0.00102 0 987 B
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.22μs 0.299ns 1.16ns 0.0135 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.44μs 0.845ns 3.16ns 0.0131 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch net472 2.59μs 2.03ns 7.85ns 0.157 0 0 995 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.38μs 0.775ns 2.9ns 0.0131 0 0 952 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.52μs 0.687ns 2.48ns 0.0138 0 0 1.02 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.58μs 1.61ns 6.24ns 0.167 0 0 1.05 KB
#6175 CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.25μs 0.932ns 3.61ns 0.0137 0 0 976 B
#6175 CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.56μs 0.491ns 1.9ns 0.0133 0 0 976 B
#6175 CallElasticsearch net472 2.51μs 0.97ns 3.76ns 0.157 0 0 995 B
#6175 CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.27μs 0.316ns 1.18ns 0.0133 0 0 952 B
#6175 CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.63μs 0.719ns 2.59ns 0.0138 0 0 1.02 KB
#6175 CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.64μs 1.92ns 7.42ns 0.166 0 0 1.05 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #6175

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync‑net6.0 1.114 1,340.15 1,202.80

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.34μs 0.467ns 1.81ns 0.0134 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.58μs 0.606ns 2.27ns 0.0126 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync net472 1.75μs 0.676ns 2.62ns 0.145 0 0 915 B
#6175 ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.2μs 0.828ns 3.1ns 0.0132 0 0 952 B
#6175 ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.57μs 1.83ns 7.07ns 0.0125 0 0 952 B
#6175 ExecuteAsync net472 1.71μs 0.598ns 2.24ns 0.145 0 0 915 B
Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendAsync net6.0 4.15μs 2.43ns 9.1ns 0.031 0 0 2.22 KB
master SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.17μs 3.02ns 11.7ns 0.0362 0 0 2.76 KB
master SendAsync net472 7.2μs 2.05ns 7.95ns 0.486 0 0 3.07 KB
#6175 SendAsync net6.0 4.31μs 2.14ns 8.01ns 0.0304 0 0 2.22 KB
#6175 SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.17μs 3.76ns 13.5ns 0.0363 0 0 2.76 KB
#6175 SendAsync net472 7.23μs 1.55ns 6ns 0.487 0 0 3.07 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 1.52μs 0.828ns 3.1ns 0.0229 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.23μs 1ns 3.76ns 0.0224 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 2.57μs 1ns 3.75ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
#6175 EnrichedLog net6.0 1.52μs 2.16ns 8.09ns 0.0229 0 0 1.64 KB
#6175 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.15μs 1.48ns 5.32ns 0.0225 0 0 1.64 KB
#6175 EnrichedLog net472 2.46μs 1.69ns 6.56ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 116μs 267ns 1.04μs 0.0573 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 121μs 206ns 799ns 0 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 152μs 209ns 811ns 0.681 0.227 0 4.46 KB
#6175 EnrichedLog net6.0 117μs 125ns 468ns 0 0 0 4.28 KB
#6175 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 121μs 280ns 1.05μs 0 0 0 4.28 KB
#6175 EnrichedLog net472 153μs 245ns 948ns 0.682 0.227 0 4.46 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 3.14μs 0.991ns 3.84ns 0.0298 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.12μs 1.39ns 5.2ns 0.0292 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.84μs 0.87ns 3.37ns 0.319 0 0 2.02 KB
#6175 EnrichedLog net6.0 3.12μs 0.979ns 3.66ns 0.0313 0 0 2.2 KB
#6175 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.12μs 1.04ns 3.9ns 0.0289 0 0 2.2 KB
#6175 EnrichedLog net472 4.86μs 2.3ns 8.61ns 0.321 0 0 2.02 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendReceive net6.0 1.35μs 1.05ns 4.06ns 0.0162 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.68μs 1.36ns 5.28ns 0.0156 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive net472 2.13μs 5.19ns 20.1ns 0.183 0 0 1.16 KB
#6175 SendReceive net6.0 1.35μs 0.629ns 2.18ns 0.0161 0 0 1.14 KB
#6175 SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.68μs 3.07ns 11.5ns 0.0152 0 0 1.14 KB
#6175 SendReceive net472 2.09μs 2.88ns 10.4ns 0.183 0 0 1.16 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 2.7μs 0.668ns 2.59ns 0.0215 0 0 1.6 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.95μs 2.14ns 7.4ns 0.0218 0 0 1.65 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.49μs 3.45ns 13.4ns 0.323 0 0 2.04 KB
#6175 EnrichedLog net6.0 2.75μs 0.746ns 2.89ns 0.022 0 0 1.6 KB
#6175 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.9μs 4.14ns 16ns 0.0215 0 0 1.65 KB
#6175 EnrichedLog net472 4.32μs 1.91ns 7.16ns 0.322 0 0 2.04 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #6175

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan‑netcoreapp3.1 1.114 640.48 574.84

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartFinishSpan net6.0 409ns 0.119ns 0.462ns 0.00802 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 640ns 0.468ns 1.69ns 0.0078 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan net472 685ns 0.272ns 1.05ns 0.0915 0 0 578 B
master StartFinishScope net6.0 484ns 0.133ns 0.514ns 0.00974 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 675ns 1.26ns 4.88ns 0.00944 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope net472 872ns 0.775ns 3ns 0.105 0 0 658 B
#6175 StartFinishSpan net6.0 410ns 0.149ns 0.559ns 0.00797 0 0 576 B
#6175 StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 575ns 0.288ns 1.12ns 0.00759 0 0 576 B
#6175 StartFinishSpan net472 684ns 0.268ns 1.04ns 0.0915 0 0 578 B
#6175 StartFinishScope net6.0 486ns 0.417ns 1.61ns 0.00978 0 0 696 B
#6175 StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 702ns 0.569ns 2.2ns 0.00939 0 0 696 B
#6175 StartFinishScope net472 899ns 1.19ns 4.61ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 644ns 0.279ns 1.08ns 0.00974 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 983ns 0.62ns 2.4ns 0.00934 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.17μs 0.278ns 1.08ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
#6175 RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 581ns 0.21ns 0.786ns 0.00977 0 0 696 B
#6175 RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 994ns 0.455ns 1.76ns 0.00898 0 0 696 B
#6175 RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.1μs 0.306ns 1.18ns 0.104 0 0 658 B

@link04 link04 marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2024 21:34
@link04 link04 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 22, 2024 21:34
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ internal IntegrationSettings(string integrationName, IConfigurationSource? sourc
var config = new ConfigurationBuilder(source, NullConfigurationTelemetry.Instance);
EnabledInternal = config
.WithKeys(
string.Format(ConfigurationKeys.Integrations.Enabled, integrationName.ToUpperInvariant()),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice 👍🏽

@link04 link04 merged commit 2eb04ff into master Nov 1, 2024
73 of 74 checks passed
@link04 link04 deleted the maximo/consistent-integrations-enabled-casing branch November 1, 2024 04:55
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Nov 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:tracer The core tracer library (Datadog.Trace, does not include OpenTracing, native code, or integrations)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants