Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ASM] Update WAF version to 1.20.1 #6174

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

NachoEchevarria
Copy link
Contributor

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria commented Oct 21, 2024

Summary of changes

This PR updates the WAF to its latest version.

This version corrects some issues related to Rasp's Lfi vulnerability and adds some ShellI features.

Reason for change

Implementation details

Test coverage

Other details

Copy link
Contributor

Snapshots difference summary

The following differences have been observed in committed snapshots. It is meant to help the reviewer.
The diff is simplistic, so please check some files anyway while we improve it.

2 occurrences of :

-        "_dd.appsec.waf.version": "1.20.0",
+        "_dd.appsec.waf.version": "1.20.1",

8 occurrences of :

-      _dd.appsec.waf.version: 1.20.0,
+      _dd.appsec.waf.version: 1.20.1,

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria changed the title Update WAF version [ASM] Update WAF version to 1.20.1 Oct 21, 2024
@datadog-ddstaging
Copy link

datadog-ddstaging bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: nacho/UpdateWafVersion1.20.1
Commit report: aac6a00
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet

✅ 0 Failed, 364815 Passed, 2092 Skipped, 15h 8m 56.5s Total Time

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6174) - mean (70ms)  : 67, 73
     .   : milestone, 70,
    master - mean (70ms)  : 68, 72
     .   : milestone, 70,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6174) - mean (1,115ms)  : 1090, 1140
     .   : milestone, 1115,
    master - mean (1,108ms)  : 1087, 1128
     .   : milestone, 1108,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6174) - mean (109ms)  : 107, 111
     .   : milestone, 109,
    master - mean (109ms)  : 105, 112
     .   : milestone, 109,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6174) - mean (771ms)  : 757, 786
     .   : milestone, 771,
    master - mean (775ms)  : 757, 794
     .   : milestone, 775,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6174) - mean (93ms)  : 90, 96
     .   : milestone, 93,
    master - mean (92ms)  : 89, 95
     .   : milestone, 92,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6174) - mean (728ms)  : 705, 751
     .   : milestone, 728,
    master - mean (726ms)  : 712, 740
     .   : milestone, 726,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6174) - mean (191ms)  : 187, 194
     .   : milestone, 191,
    master - mean (191ms)  : 188, 194
     .   : milestone, 191,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6174) - mean (1,210ms)  : 1178, 1242
     .   : milestone, 1210,
    master - mean (1,199ms)  : 1173, 1224
     .   : milestone, 1199,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6174) - mean (275ms)  : 271, 279
     .   : milestone, 275,
    master - mean (276ms)  : 272, 279
     .   : milestone, 276,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6174) - mean (945ms)  : 924, 967
     .   : milestone, 945,
    master - mean (943ms)  : 927, 960
     .   : milestone, 943,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6174) - mean (264ms)  : 261, 268
     .   : milestone, 264,
    master - mean (265ms)  : 260, 270
     .   : milestone, 265,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6174) - mean (926ms)  : 907, 945
     .   : milestone, 926,
    master - mean (931ms)  : 914, 948
     .   : milestone, 931,

Loading

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

Throughput/Crank Report ⚡

Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits:

Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards!

gantt
    title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6174) (10.944M)   : 0, 10944455
    master (11.119M)   : 0, 11118546
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (11.081M)   : 0, 11080577

    section Automatic
    This PR (6174) (7.390M)   : 0, 7390126
    master (7.321M)   : 0, 7321152
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.732M)   : 0, 7732233

    section Trace stats
    master (7.757M)   : 0, 7756918

    section Manual
    master (11.210M)   : 0, 11209846

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6174) (6.813M)   : 0, 6812513
    master (6.740M)   : 0, 6740459

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (10.109M)   : 0, 10109349

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6174) (9.746M)   : 0, 9745518
    master (9.561M)   : 0, 9560673
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.798M)   : 0, 9798067

    section Automatic
    This PR (6174) (6.689M)   : 0, 6688598
    master (6.578M)   : 0, 6578194

    section Trace stats
    master (6.868M)   : 0, 6867545

    section Manual
    master (9.568M)   : 0, 9568124

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6174) (6.137M)   : 0, 6137325
    master (6.203M)   : 0, 6203435

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (8.858M)   : 0, 8857806

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6174) (9.919M)   : 0, 9918782
    master (9.889M)   : 0, 9889232
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (10.067M)   : 0, 10067315

    section Automatic
    This PR (6174) (6.437M)   : 0, 6436646
    master (6.396M)   : 0, 6396160
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.552M)   : 0, 7552193

    section Trace stats
    master (7.205M)   : 0, 7205159

    section Manual
    master (9.853M)   : 0, 9852595

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6174) (5.947M)   : 0, 5947445
    master (5.939M)   : 0, 5939480

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (9.222M)   : 0, 9221606

Loading

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #6174 compared to master:

  • 1 benchmarks are faster, with geometric mean 1.156
  • 1 benchmarks are slower, with geometric mean 1.180
  • 1 benchmarks have more allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

  • Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartStopWithChild net6.0 7.8μs 43.4ns 310ns 0.0152 0.00758 0 5.43 KB
master StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 9.86μs 54.5ns 318ns 0.0242 0.00968 0 5.61 KB
master StartStopWithChild net472 16.1μs 59ns 228ns 1.02 0.311 0.0957 6.06 KB
#6174 StartStopWithChild net6.0 7.53μs 42.6ns 301ns 0.0194 0.00776 0 5.42 KB
#6174 StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 9.88μs 54.5ns 349ns 0.0242 0.0145 0.00484 5.62 KB
#6174 StartStopWithChild net472 16.2μs 35.5ns 137ns 1.03 0.321 0.0883 6.07 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 478μs 127ns 459ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 653μs 493ns 1.91μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 837μs 387ns 1.45μs 0.422 0 0 3.3 KB
#6174 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 469μs 126ns 470ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#6174 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 645μs 355ns 1.37μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#6174 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 842μs 714ns 2.76μs 0.419 0 0 3.3 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendRequest net6.0 206μs 1.55μs 15.5μs 0.212 0 0 18.45 KB
master SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 231μs 1.35μs 12.6μs 0.216 0 0 20.61 KB
master SendRequest net472 0.000903ns 0.000508ns 0.00197ns 0 0 0 0 b
#6174 SendRequest net6.0 214μs 1.22μs 9.44μs 0.198 0 0 18.45 KB
#6174 SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 223μs 1.29μs 10.3μs 0.204 0 0 20.61 KB
#6174 SendRequest net472 0.000706ns 0.000411ns 0.00154ns 0 0 0 0 b
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ More allocations ⚠️

More allocations ⚠️ in #6174

Benchmark Base Allocated Diff Allocated Change Change %
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces‑netcoreapp3.1 41.49 KB 41.84 KB 349 B 0.84%

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 598μs 3.4μs 23.6μs 0.563 0 0 41.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 767μs 4.24μs 26.2μs 0.383 0 0 41.49 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 875μs 2.76μs 10.3μs 8.33 2.31 0.463 53.34 KB
#6174 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 573μs 3.02μs 14.8μs 0.59 0 0 41.56 KB
#6174 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 685μs 3.48μs 16μs 0.334 0 0 41.84 KB
#6174 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 882μs 4.65μs 23.3μs 8.39 2.52 0.419 53.34 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #6174

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark.ExecuteNonQuery‑net6.0 1.156 1,356.94 1,174.27

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.36μs 0.76ns 2.84ns 0.0143 0 0 1.02 KB
master ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.79μs 1.54ns 5.76ns 0.0135 0 0 1.02 KB
master ExecuteNonQuery net472 2.12μs 1.71ns 6.61ns 0.157 0 0 987 B
#6174 ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.18μs 1.48ns 5.75ns 0.0141 0 0 1.02 KB
#6174 ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.75μs 1.12ns 4.17ns 0.0132 0 0 1.02 KB
#6174 ExecuteNonQuery net472 2.1μs 2.43ns 9.42ns 0.157 0 0 987 B
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.19μs 2.91ns 11.3ns 0.0135 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.59μs 0.604ns 2.26ns 0.0128 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch net472 2.59μs 1.14ns 4.4ns 0.157 0 0 995 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.3μs 0.557ns 2.16ns 0.0136 0 0 952 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.66μs 0.745ns 2.79ns 0.0141 0 0 1.02 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.47μs 1.53ns 5.94ns 0.167 0 0 1.05 KB
#6174 CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.21μs 0.547ns 2.05ns 0.0133 0 0 976 B
#6174 CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.55μs 0.68ns 2.45ns 0.0132 0 0 976 B
#6174 CallElasticsearch net472 2.45μs 1ns 3.75ns 0.158 0 0 995 B
#6174 CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.2μs 0.417ns 1.56ns 0.0132 0 0 952 B
#6174 CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.63μs 0.743ns 2.68ns 0.0139 0 0 1.02 KB
#6174 CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.68μs 0.882ns 3.42ns 0.166 0 0 1.05 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.38μs 1.03ns 3.99ns 0.0131 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.67μs 1.8ns 6.74ns 0.0123 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync net472 1.78μs 0.713ns 2.76ns 0.145 0 0 915 B
#6174 ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.29μs 0.502ns 1.95ns 0.0135 0 0 952 B
#6174 ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.59μs 0.98ns 3.8ns 0.0127 0 0 952 B
#6174 ExecuteAsync net472 1.77μs 0.757ns 2.83ns 0.145 0 0 915 B
Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendAsync net6.0 4.18μs 2.36ns 9.13ns 0.031 0 0 2.22 KB
master SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.01μs 1.48ns 5.54ns 0.0378 0 0 2.76 KB
master SendAsync net472 7.91μs 1.26ns 4.72ns 0.498 0 0 3.15 KB
#6174 SendAsync net6.0 4.27μs 1.08ns 4.19ns 0.03 0 0 2.22 KB
#6174 SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.2μs 2.36ns 8.82ns 0.0365 0 0 2.76 KB
#6174 SendAsync net472 7.83μs 14.6ns 54.7ns 0.498 0 0 3.15 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 1.51μs 0.841ns 3.03ns 0.0228 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.2μs 1.81ns 6.75ns 0.0222 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 2.68μs 1.03ns 3.98ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
#6174 EnrichedLog net6.0 1.44μs 0.861ns 3.33ns 0.0233 0 0 1.64 KB
#6174 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.3μs 1.11ns 4ns 0.0221 0 0 1.64 KB
#6174 EnrichedLog net472 2.56μs 0.575ns 2.15ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 117μs 221ns 856ns 0 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 121μs 273ns 1.02μs 0.0597 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 150μs 188ns 704ns 0.673 0.224 0 4.46 KB
#6174 EnrichedLog net6.0 117μs 143ns 554ns 0.0589 0 0 4.28 KB
#6174 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 120μs 430ns 1.66μs 0.0597 0 0 4.28 KB
#6174 EnrichedLog net472 152μs 170ns 657ns 0.683 0.228 0 4.46 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 3.08μs 1.03ns 3.98ns 0.0313 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.23μs 1.69ns 6.56ns 0.0297 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.7μs 1.57ns 6.09ns 0.32 0 0 2.02 KB
#6174 EnrichedLog net6.0 3.11μs 0.96ns 3.72ns 0.0312 0 0 2.2 KB
#6174 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.34μs 1.32ns 5.13ns 0.0281 0 0 2.2 KB
#6174 EnrichedLog net472 4.81μs 1.12ns 4.33ns 0.32 0 0 2.02 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendReceive net6.0 1.4μs 0.902ns 3.49ns 0.0161 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.77μs 2.36ns 9.13ns 0.015 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive net472 2.15μs 0.688ns 2.48ns 0.184 0.00107 0 1.16 KB
#6174 SendReceive net6.0 1.34μs 0.455ns 1.7ns 0.0161 0 0 1.14 KB
#6174 SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.76μs 0.85ns 3.29ns 0.015 0 0 1.14 KB
#6174 SendReceive net472 2.15μs 1.72ns 6.66ns 0.184 0 0 1.16 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 2.55μs 0.732ns 2.83ns 0.0226 0 0 1.6 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.94μs 1.57ns 5.87ns 0.022 0 0 1.65 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.36μs 1.31ns 4.89ns 0.322 0 0 2.04 KB
#6174 EnrichedLog net6.0 2.76μs 0.69ns 2.58ns 0.0221 0 0 1.6 KB
#6174 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.99μs 0.966ns 3.74ns 0.0219 0 0 1.65 KB
#6174 EnrichedLog net472 4.5μs 2.45ns 8.5ns 0.323 0 0 2.04 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #6174

Benchmark diff/base Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope‑net6.0 1.180 486.31 573.74

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartFinishSpan net6.0 400ns 0.414ns 1.6ns 0.00801 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 586ns 0.379ns 1.47ns 0.00756 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan net472 720ns 0.739ns 2.86ns 0.0917 0 0 578 B
master StartFinishScope net6.0 486ns 0.378ns 1.46ns 0.00984 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 762ns 4.05ns 19.8ns 0.00946 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope net472 859ns 0.956ns 3.7ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
#6174 StartFinishSpan net6.0 399ns 0.35ns 1.35ns 0.00801 0 0 576 B
#6174 StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 582ns 0.43ns 1.67ns 0.00775 0 0 576 B
#6174 StartFinishSpan net472 744ns 0.931ns 3.6ns 0.0917 0 0 578 B
#6174 StartFinishScope net6.0 573ns 0.645ns 2.41ns 0.00984 0 0 696 B
#6174 StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 715ns 0.612ns 2.37ns 0.00933 0 0 696 B
#6174 StartFinishScope net472 842ns 0.695ns 2.69ns 0.105 0 0 658 B
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 659ns 1.67ns 6.47ns 0.00979 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 942ns 1.28ns 4.44ns 0.00906 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.08μs 0.95ns 3.68ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
#6174 RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 732ns 0.585ns 2.27ns 0.00987 0 0 696 B
#6174 RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 926ns 1.07ns 4.16ns 0.00925 0 0 696 B
#6174 RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.13μs 1.36ns 5.25ns 0.104 0 0 658 B

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2024 10:24
@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria requested review from a team as code owners October 22, 2024 10:24
@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria merged commit ed3b441 into master Oct 22, 2024
75 checks passed
@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria deleted the nacho/UpdateWafVersion1.20.1 branch October 22, 2024 14:36
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Oct 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants