Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setting up code scanning on datadog-operator #442

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2022

Conversation

ganeshkumarsv
Copy link
Contributor

Static code analysis on datadog-operator using Github's Code Scanning.

This PR has Github workflow configs to trigger the Code Scanning on every PR and on push to master branch. As of now only default security based CodeQL queries are configured. We can gradually add queries for Code Quality later. It is a part of Datadog compliance requirements to regularly perform code-scanning on all the customer installed code. As the repository is small, no security alerts were found during the scan.

@ganeshkumarsv ganeshkumarsv requested a review from a team as a code owner February 4, 2022 01:14
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This pull request does not contain a valid label. Please add one of the following labels: bug, enhancement, refactoring, documentation

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #442 (728dcfd) into main (f267051) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #442   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.05%   61.05%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines          95       95           
=======================================
  Hits           58       58           
  Misses         25       25           
  Partials       12       12           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 61.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f267051...728dcfd. Read the comment docs.

@davidor davidor added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 4, 2022
@clamoriniere clamoriniere merged commit d11ec31 into DataDog:main Feb 8, 2022
@khewonc khewonc mentioned this pull request May 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants