Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[e2e] mark TestGPU as flake #32534

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 27, 2024

Conversation

pducolin
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

  • Mark TestGPU as flake
  • Add some logs to help investigating the root cause

Motivation

incident-33572: this test is flaky at setup time, failing with

resolving options: rpc error: code = Canceled desc = context canceled

at setup time

Describe how you validated your changes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@pducolin pducolin requested a review from a team as a code owner December 27, 2024 10:14
@github-actions github-actions bot added team/ebpf-platform short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Dec 27, 2024
@pducolin pducolin force-pushed the pducolin/incident-33572-mark-TestGPU-flake branch from 96c6036 to 661cf82 Compare December 27, 2024 10:15
@pducolin pducolin added changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Dec 27, 2024
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 27, 2024

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 51840029 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:
  • tests_windows-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 237b1f2a08434387e1a22e5e42cecabead23c543

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.01MB ⚠️ 944.70MB 944.69MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.01MB ⚠️ 935.40MB 935.39MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.01MB ⚠️ 1191.11MB 1191.10MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.01MB ⚠️ 1200.42MB 1200.42MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.01MB ⚠️ 1200.42MB 1200.42MB 140.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 78.57MB 78.57MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 55.77MB 55.77MB 10.00MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 505.27MB 505.27MB 70.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 113.35MB 113.35MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 108.81MB 108.81MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm -0.00MB 78.65MB 78.65MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse -0.00MB 78.65MB 78.65MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm -0.00MB 113.42MB 113.42MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse -0.00MB 113.42MB 113.42MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm -0.00MB 108.88MB 108.88MB 10.00MB

Decision

⚠️ Warning

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=51840029 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 8016faa

Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: a1f79b2c-b1e9-4a77-abe6-4dfb8f73c5db

Baseline: 237b1f2
Comparison: 8016faa
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
file_tree memory utilization +0.76 [+0.64, +0.88] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.50 [+0.44, +0.55] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.48 [+0.44, +0.52] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.11 [-0.78, +1.00] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.06 [-0.72, +0.84] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.05 [-0.68, +0.78] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.05 [-0.59, +0.69] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.04 [-0.84, +0.92] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.75, +0.81] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.12, +0.11] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.01 [-0.47, +0.45] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput -0.01 [-0.87, +0.85] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.23 [-0.91, +0.46] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.33 [-0.41, -0.24] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -0.77 [-3.97, +2.43] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@pducolin
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2024-12-27 13:29:29 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 35m.


2024-12-27 14:01:35 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 46749fd into main Dec 27, 2024
392 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the pducolin/incident-33572-mark-TestGPU-flake branch December 27, 2024 14:01
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.63.0 milestone Dec 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/ebpf-platform
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants