Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release] Update release.json and Go modules for 7.61.0-rc.8 #32423

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.61.0 milestone Dec 20, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot requested review from a team as code owners December 20, 2024 14:06
@github-actions github-actions bot requested review from jade-guiton-dd and ogaca-dd and removed request for a team December 20, 2024 14:06
Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 0bcb7030-b5e4-4d0e-b05f-d40b9a2e4ee9

Baseline: 54b17d2
Comparison: dd75e25
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +1.49 [+1.38, +1.60] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +1.23 [-1.74, +4.20] 1 Logs
pycheck_lots_of_tags % cpu utilization +0.83 [-2.63, +4.30] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.54 [-0.25, +1.32] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization +0.26 [+0.12, +0.41] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.24 [-0.52, +1.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.06 [-0.58, +0.69] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.69, +0.71] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.10, +0.09] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.01 [-0.74, +0.73] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.04 [-0.84, +0.76] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.18 [-0.24, -0.11] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.36 [-0.82, +0.10] 1 Logs
basic_py_check % cpu utilization -0.39 [-4.09, +3.31] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.54 [-0.59, -0.50] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -1.10 [-1.78, -0.41] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 9/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@FlorentClarret FlorentClarret merged commit 9017a87 into 7.61.x Dec 20, 2024
350 of 366 checks passed
@FlorentClarret FlorentClarret deleted the release/7.61.0-rc.8-1734703485 branch December 20, 2024 16:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants