Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(installer): Make policy metadata files root-owned & world-readable #32356

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

BaptisteFoy
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Fixes a bug at installer install: we try to write the policy metadata files as dd-agent before having created the dd-agent user.
This PR makes the file owned by root instead, and world-readable so that the daemon can read it. There is no sensitive data in this file anyway.

Motivation

Describe how you validated your changes

Tested manually on a VM + E2E tests

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@BaptisteFoy BaptisteFoy marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2024 17:14
@BaptisteFoy BaptisteFoy requested review from a team as code owners December 18, 2024 17:14
@BaptisteFoy BaptisteFoy force-pushed the baptiste.foy/FA/fix-dd-agent-issue branch from f3d69a1 to bcd19da Compare December 18, 2024 17:14
@github-actions github-actions bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Dec 18, 2024
@BaptisteFoy BaptisteFoy added changelog/no-changelog qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/fleet-automation and removed team/windows-agent labels Dec 18, 2024
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=51475987 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit bcd19da

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 8949577ed72baea2dd7697db60ad37b838d3999e

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 1187.76MB 1187.76MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 1197.00MB 1197.00MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 1197.00MB 1197.00MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 933.77MB 933.77MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 942.99MB 942.99MB 140.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 78.59MB 78.59MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 78.67MB 78.67MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 78.67MB 78.67MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 55.79MB 55.79MB 10.00MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 505.06MB 505.06MB 70.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 113.31MB 113.31MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 113.38MB 113.38MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 113.38MB 113.38MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 108.78MB 108.78MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 108.85MB 108.85MB 10.00MB

Decision

✅ Passed

Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: adc9ee2c-fc3f-4eeb-8553-875edb15b656

Baseline: 8949577
Comparison: bcd19da
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +2.27 [+2.15, +2.40] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_tree memory utilization +0.63 [+0.50, +0.76] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.49 [-0.23, +1.21] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.44 [+0.39, +0.49] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.40 [-0.38, +1.18] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput +0.16 [-0.30, +0.62] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.09 [-0.69, +0.87] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.06 [-0.81, +0.92] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.04 [-0.59, +0.66] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.83, +0.89] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.00 [-0.90, +0.91] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.11, +0.11] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.68, +0.65] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.47 [-0.53, -0.41] 1 Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -1.04 [-1.71, -0.36] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -4.06 [-6.96, -1.17] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@BaptisteFoy
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2024-12-19 08:02:17 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 26m.


2024-12-19 08:38:23 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 83bedeb into main Dec 19, 2024
274 of 276 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the baptiste.foy/FA/fix-dd-agent-issue branch December 19, 2024 08:38
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.62.0 milestone Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/fleet-automation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants