[OTEL-2314] upgrade otel collector packages to v0.116.0 #32305
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
songy23
added
changelog/no-changelog
dependencies
Go Package Import DifferencesBaseline: c29edf5
|
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Diff per package
Decision |
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=51489072 --os-family=ubuntuNote: This applies to commit 49e4ab8 |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: c29edf5 Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | +1.21 | [+1.08, +1.34] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | +0.76 | [+0.08, +1.44] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +0.71 | [-0.01, +1.44] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.53 | [+0.46, +0.60] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.42 | [+0.28, +0.55] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.25 | [-0.51, +1.02] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.11 | [-0.79, +1.01] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.08 | [-0.63, +0.78] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.07 | [+0.02, +0.11] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.78, +0.79] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.09, +0.09] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | -0.05 | [-0.52, +0.42] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | -0.06 | [-0.99, +0.87] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.11 | [-0.75, +0.52] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.46 | [-1.23, +0.31] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -0.98 | [-3.87, +1.91] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 9/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
kkhor-datadog
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2024
jszwedko
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2024
ajgajg1134
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2024
CelianR
approved these changes
Dec 18, 2024
pducolin
approved these changes
Dec 18, 2024
| @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ require ( | |||
| github.com/gobwas/glob v0.2.3 // indirect | |||
| github.com/gofrs/flock v0.12.1 // indirect | |||
| github.com/golang/groupcache v0.0.0-20210331224755-41bb18bfe9da // indirect | |||
| github.com/golang/mock v1.6.0 // indirect | |||
| github.com/golang/mock v1.7.0-rc.1 // indirect | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❓ question
Is it safe to use rc versions of packages?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like github.com/golang/mock has been unmaintained for a long time, and v1.6.0 is its last release. I think it makes more sense to pin v1.6.0
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Upgrade otel collector packages to v0.116.0 with
inv collector.updateMotivation
Keep otel dependencies up-to-date