Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(pkg_size): Delete old code and round the diff #32207

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chouetz
Copy link
Member

@chouetz chouetz commented Dec 16, 2024

What does this PR do?

  • Remove code from the old pkg_size method
  • Update the report so that differences under 0,01MB are ignored

Motivation

Concerning the report update, we are currently facing PR changing no code and reporting warnings because the package size diff is not 0.
This is due to 2 causes:

  • agent-integration version is not pinned, so there can be commits on its main branch between the ancestor and the commit we compare package size with
  • The compression of minimized-btfs.tar.xz can vary because of metadata (timestamp)

Describe how you validated your changes

Updated the unit tests associated

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

With this we hide small updates on the package size that could be caused by other origin than the 2 listed above. We have on-going threads to be able to get rid of these 2 constraints, so we will have to deactivate this rounding to be as precise as possible

Additional Notes

@chouetz chouetz requested review from a team as code owners December 16, 2024 10:14
@chouetz chouetz added changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Dec 16, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the medium review PR review might take time label Dec 16, 2024
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 16, 2024

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 51468064 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:
  • tests_deb-arm64-py3
  • tests_deb-x64-py3
  • tests_flavor_dogstatsd_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_heroku_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_iot_deb-x64
  • tests_rpm-arm64-py3
  • tests_rpm-x64-py3
  • tests_windows-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help

tasks/libs/package/utils.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor fde3c5b85c546793f1899f942f9afa7e8583269b

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.01MB ⚠️ 505.43MB 505.42MB 70.00MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 1013.17MB 1013.16MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 1003.95MB 1003.95MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 1278.10MB 1278.10MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 1278.10MB 1278.10MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 1268.87MB 1268.87MB 140.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 78.52MB 78.52MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 78.59MB 78.59MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 78.59MB 78.59MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 55.74MB 55.74MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 113.28MB 113.28MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 113.35MB 113.35MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 113.35MB 113.35MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 108.76MB 108.76MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 108.83MB 108.83MB 10.00MB

Decision

⚠️ Warning

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Gitlab CI Configuration Changes

Added Jobs

check_pkg_size
check_pkg_size:
  image: registry.ddbuild.io/ci/datadog-agent-buildimages/deb_x64$DATADOG_AGENT_BUILDIMAGES_SUFFIX:$DATADOG_AGENT_BUILDIMAGES
  needs:
  - agent_deb-x64-a7
  - iot_agent_deb-x64
  - dogstatsd_deb-x64
  - agent_heroku_deb-x64-a7
  - agent_rpm-x64-a7
  - iot_agent_rpm-x64
  - dogstatsd_rpm-x64
  - agent_suse-x64-a7
  - dogstatsd_suse-x64
  - iot_agent_suse-x64
  - agent_deb-arm64-a7
  - iot_agent_deb-arm64
  - dogstatsd_deb-arm64
  - agent_rpm-arm64-a7
  - iot_agent_rpm-arm64
  rules:
  - if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^mq-working-branch-/
    when: never
  - when: on_success
  script:
  - GITHUB_KEY_B64=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_GITHUB_APP key_b64)
    || exit $?; export GITHUB_KEY_B64
  - GITHUB_APP_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_GITHUB_APP app_id)
    || exit $?; export GITHUB_APP_ID
  - GITHUB_INSTALLATION_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_GITHUB_APP
    installation_id) || exit $?; export GITHUB_INSTALLATION_ID
  - echo "Using agent GitHub App"
  - inv package.check-size
  stage: pkg_metrics
  tags:
  - arch:amd64

Removed Jobs

  • .check_pkg_size
  • check_pkg_size-amd64-a7
  • check_pkg_size-arm64-a7
  • new_check_pkg_size

Changes Summary

Removed Modified Added Renamed
4 0 1 0

ℹ️ Diff available in the job log.

Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 9156a924-f4ef-4d7d-bcb6-52b4fe433573

Baseline: fde3c5b
Comparison: bb0fbed
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.28 [+0.24, +0.32] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput +0.27 [-0.20, +0.74] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.06 [-0.00, +0.13] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.05 [-0.79, +0.88] 1 Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput +0.05 [-0.61, +0.71] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.02 [-0.09, +0.12] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.83, +0.85] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.74, +0.75] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.00 [-0.85, +0.85] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.04 [-0.80, +0.73] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput -0.11 [-0.74, +0.52] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.12 [-0.25, +0.00] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.24 [-0.96, +0.49] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.49 [-1.28, +0.30] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -1.00 [-1.13, -0.88] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -1.15 [-4.09, +1.79] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 9/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@chouetz
Copy link
Member Author

chouetz commented Dec 19, 2024

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2024-12-19 09:27:06 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 26m.


2024-12-19 09:47:47 UTCMergeQueue: The build pipeline contains failing jobs for this merge request

Build pipeline has failing jobs for b09a09d:

⚠️ Do NOT retry failed jobs directly (why?).

What to do next?

  • Investigate the failures and when ready, re-add your pull request to the queue!
  • Any question, go check the FAQ.
Details

Since those jobs are not marked as being allowed to fail, the pipeline will most likely fail.
Therefore, and to allow other builds to be processed, this merge request has been rejected and the pipeline got canceled.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog medium review PR review might take time qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants