Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "feat(notify): Add conductor scheduled pipelines to the notification rules" #32163

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

spencergilbert
Copy link
Contributor

Reverts #32094

@spencergilbert spencergilbert self-assigned this Dec 13, 2024
@spencergilbert spencergilbert requested review from a team as code owners December 13, 2024 16:51
@github-actions github-actions bot added team/agent-devx-infra medium review PR review might take time labels Dec 13, 2024
@spencergilbert spencergilbert added changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Dec 13, 2024
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Gitlab CI Configuration Changes

Modified Jobs

notify
  notify:
    dependencies: []
    image: registry.ddbuild.io/slack-notifier:v27936653-9a2a7db-sdm-gbi-jammy@sha256:c9d1145319d1904fa72ea97904a15200d3cb684324723f9e1700bc02cc85065c
    resource_group: notification
    rules:
    - if: $DEPLOY_AGENT == "true" || $DDR_WORKFLOW_ID != null
      when: always
    - if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == "main"
      when: always
    - if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.x$/
      when: always
    script:
    - GITLAB_TOKEN=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $GITLAB_TOKEN read_api)
      || exit $?; export GITLAB_TOKEN
    - DD_API_KEY=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_API_KEY_ORG2 token)
      || exit $?; export DD_API_KEY
    - python3 -m pip install -r requirements.txt -r tasks/libs/requirements-notifications.txt
-   - invoke -e notify.send-message
-   - invoke -e notify.check-consistent-failures
+   - "# Do not send notifications if this is a child pipeline of another repo\n# The\
+     \ triggering repo should already have its own notification system\nif [ \"$CI_PIPELINE_SOURCE\"\
+     \ != \"pipeline\" ]; then\n  if [ \"$DEPLOY_AGENT\" = \"true\" ]; then\n    invoke\
+     \ -e notify.send-message --notification-type \"deploy\"\n  elif [ \"$CI_PIPELINE_SOURCE\"\
+     \ != \"push\" ]; then\n    invoke -e notify.send-message --notification-type \"\
+     trigger\"\n  else\n    invoke -e notify.send-message --notification-type \"merge\"\
+     \n  fi\n  if [ \"$CI_COMMIT_BRANCH\" = \"$CI_DEFAULT_BRANCH\" ]; then\n    invoke\
+     \ notify.check-consistent-failures\n  fi\nelse\n  echo \"This pipeline was triggered\
+     \ by another repository, skipping notification.\"\nfi\n"
    stage: notify
    tags:
    - arch:amd64
    timeout: 15 minutes

Changes Summary

Removed Modified Added Renamed
0 1 0 0

ℹ️ Diff available in the job log.

@spencergilbert spencergilbert merged commit f95df91 into main Dec 13, 2024
57 of 63 checks passed
@spencergilbert spencergilbert deleted the revert-32094-nschweitzer/conductor branch December 13, 2024 16:54
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.62.0 milestone Dec 13, 2024
chouetz added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2024
Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: fbb3816c-5396-4f94-aaef-1557cdc59e2a

Baseline: 8dc9c9d
Comparison: ad0959c
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.80 [+0.07, +1.53] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.22 [-0.55, +0.98] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization +0.21 [+0.09, +0.33] 1 Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput +0.19 [-0.50, +0.89] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.16 [+0.10, +0.22] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.08 [-0.80, +0.97] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.02 [-0.85, +0.89] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.01 [-0.81, +0.84] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.77, +0.79] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.09, +0.10] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.78, +0.75] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput -0.03 [-0.67, +0.60] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.04 [-0.50, +0.42] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.28 [-0.41, -0.15] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.43 [-0.47, -0.38] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -1.28 [-4.19, +1.62] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 9/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 9/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

chouetz added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2024
chouetz added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog medium review PR review might take time qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation team/agent-devx-infra
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants