Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add collector update PR inv task and fix inv collector.update #31545

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

jackgopack4
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

fixes memory leak in inv collector.update and moves logic for weekly collector update/generate task to separate bash script

Motivation

failed GH Actions run: https://github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/actions/runs/12055965363

Describe how to test/QA your changes

run .github/scripts/otel-collector-update-generate.sh with $GITHUB_TOKEN in your environment

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@jackgopack4 jackgopack4 requested review from a team and dineshg13 and removed request for a team November 27, 2024 19:27
@github-actions github-actions bot added team/agent-devx-infra short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Nov 27, 2024
@jackgopack4 jackgopack4 added changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Nov 27, 2024
@jackgopack4 jackgopack4 marked this pull request as ready for review November 27, 2024 19:34
@jackgopack4 jackgopack4 requested review from a team as code owners November 27, 2024 19:34
@github-actions github-actions bot added medium review PR review might take time and removed short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Nov 27, 2024
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Nov 27, 2024

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 50842050 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:
  • tests_deb-arm64-py3
  • tests_deb-x64-py3
  • tests_flavor_dogstatsd_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_heroku_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_iot_deb-x64
  • tests_rpm-arm64-py3
  • tests_rpm-x64-py3
  • tests_windows-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 9af330a2-6eb5-4403-ad1c-d97e0d9575ad

Baseline: 91dc636
Comparison: 48fa6b0
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +1.31 [+1.19, +1.44] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.91 [+0.85, +0.97] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.67 [-0.13, +1.48] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.39 [+0.35, +0.44] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.11 [-0.66, +0.87] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput +0.03 [-0.44, +0.49] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.02 [-0.83, +0.87] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.77, +0.79] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.00 [-0.81, +0.82] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput -0.00 [-0.81, +0.81] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.02 [-0.12, +0.09] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput -0.03 [-0.65, +0.60] 1 Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -0.14 [-0.85, +0.56] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.23 [-0.96, +0.50] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.57 [-0.69, -0.46] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -1.29 [-4.23, +1.65] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 9/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

.github/scripts/otel-collector-update-generate.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/collector-generate-and-update.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/collector-generate-and-update.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/scripts/otel-collector-update-generate.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@pducolin
Copy link
Contributor

Ok for @DataDog/agent-devx-loops owned files

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 91dc6364b51e2fda790ffe765975cf1fb1b9e3ac

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 1271.32MB 1271.32MB 140.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 113.22MB 113.22MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 78.33MB 78.33MB 10.00MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 526.48MB 526.48MB 70.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 1280.56MB 1280.56MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 1280.56MB 1280.56MB 140.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 113.29MB 113.29MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 113.29MB 113.29MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 78.41MB 78.41MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 78.41MB 78.41MB 10.00MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 1005.47MB 1005.47MB 140.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 108.71MB 108.71MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 55.60MB 55.60MB 10.00MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 1014.68MB 1014.68MB 140.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 108.78MB 108.78MB 10.00MB

Decision

✅ Passed

@jackgopack4 jackgopack4 requested a review from chouetz December 9, 2024 19:42
@jackgopack4 jackgopack4 changed the title add collector update script and fix inv collector.update add collector update PR inv task and fix inv collector.update Dec 9, 2024
@@ -479,8 +480,8 @@ def update_files(self):
"./tasks/collector.py",
"./.gitlab/integration_test/otel.yml",
]
for root, _, files in os.walk("./tasks/unit_tests/testdata/collector"):
for file in files:
for root, _, testfiles in os.walk("./tasks/unit_tests/testdata/collector"):
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this was causing the memory leak when running locally

@@ -64,11 +64,13 @@ def get_branch(self, branch_name):
return None
raise e

def create_pr(self, pr_title, pr_body, base_branch, target_branch):
def create_pr(self, pr_title, pr_body, base_branch, target_branch, draft=False):
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

was necessary to create a draft PR. I wanted to use a draft PR for this because collector dependency upgrade can break existing tests/codepaths and I want to be able to fix them before marking the PR ready.

@github-actions github-actions bot added long review PR is complex, plan time to review it and removed medium review PR review might take time labels Dec 9, 2024
Copy link
Member

@chouetz chouetz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the changes!

@jackgopack4
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2024-12-11 16:10:27 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 25m.


2024-12-11 16:58:12 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 56af0ca into main Dec 11, 2024
211 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the jackgopack4/fix-collector-update-script branch December 11, 2024 16:58
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.62.0 milestone Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog long review PR is complex, plan time to review it qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation team/agent-devx-infra
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants