Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 7.58.x] discovery: Allow delta for create time check #30664

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

agent-platform-auto-pr[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport f0c0ff4 from #29376.


What does this PR do?

The current time checks sometimes fail due to a one second diff in the expected and actual values.

The value returned by proc.CreateTime() can vary between invocations since the BootTime (used internally in proc.CreateTime()) can vary when the version of BootTimeWithContext which uses /proc/uptime is active in gopsutil (either on Docker, or even outside of it due to a bug fixed in v4.24.8: shirou/gopsutil@aa0b73d).

This is due to an inherent race since the code in BootTimeWithContext substracts the uptime of the host from the current time, and there can be in theory an unbounded amount of time between the read of /proc/uptime and the retrieval of the current time. Allow a 10 second diff as a reasonable value.

Motivation

Additional Notes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Describe how to test/QA your changes

@agent-platform-auto-pr agent-platform-auto-pr bot requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2024 15:11
@agent-platform-auto-pr agent-platform-auto-pr bot added qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests backport bot labels Oct 31, 2024
@agent-platform-auto-pr agent-platform-auto-pr bot requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2024 15:11
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv create-vm --pipeline-id=47967756 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 6a20d12

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 33e1bea6-6074-4236-b026-8d39dbfc1d4e Metrics dashboard Target profiles

Baseline: 2e06337
Comparison: 6a20d12

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
file_tree memory utilization +1.05 [+0.92, +1.17] 1 Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput +0.72 [-0.11, +1.55] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.60 [+0.54, +0.65] 1 Logs
basic_py_check % cpu utilization +0.18 [-2.56, +2.93] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.05 [-0.70, +0.79] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
idle memory utilization -0.19 [-0.25, -0.14] 1 Logs
pycheck_lots_of_tags % cpu utilization -1.36 [-3.96, +1.24] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed
idle memory_usage 5/10

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@vitkyrka
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Oct 31, 2024

🚂 MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in 7.58.x is 40m.

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 4ad1243 into 7.58.x Oct 31, 2024
352 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the backport-29376-to-7.58.x branch October 31, 2024 18:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport bot changelog/no-changelog component/system-probe qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/usm The USM team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant