-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CWS] retry self tests #30109
[CWS] retry self tests #30109
Conversation
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsRun ID: 99938646-b8e5-46cb-a976-bae27364a6c1 Metrics dashboard Target profiles Baseline: aa3d423 Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
No significant changes in experiment optimization goalsConfidence level: 90.00% There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | +0.80 | [-0.02, +1.61] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.78 | [+0.66, +0.91] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.60 | [+0.55, +0.66] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | idle_all_features | memory utilization | +0.13 | [+0.04, +0.23] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.32, +0.35] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.23, +0.23] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.12, +0.10] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.05 | [-0.29, +0.20] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | idle | memory utilization | -0.06 | [-0.10, -0.02] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.07 | [-0.25, +0.12] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.22 | [-0.71, +0.26] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | basic_py_check | % cpu utilization | -0.62 | [-3.33, +2.08] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -1.12 | [-1.85, -0.40] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | pycheck_lots_of_tags | % cpu utilization | -2.02 | [-4.53, +0.49] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed |
---|---|---|---|
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 |
✅ | idle | memory_usage | 10/10 |
✅ | idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
3a35e9f
to
a6c87ef
Compare
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv create-vm --pipeline-id=46689517 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit 43f60a3 |
a6c87ef
to
43f60a3
Compare
/merge |
🚂 MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue The median merge time in Use |
What does this PR do?
Give more chance to have the self tests passing. This aims to have a better self test report.
Motivation
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes