Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[NETPATH-297] Update timeout to be per hop instead of per path #29092

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 7, 2024

Conversation

ken-schneider
Copy link
Contributor

@ken-schneider ken-schneider commented Sep 5, 2024

What does this PR do?

This changes the behavior of timeout in the configuration of Network path. Previously, the timeout field controlled the timeout for the entire path trace. The default timeout has been updated to be 1000 which translates to 1 second per hop.

Motivation

Other traceroute tools use this to configure their timeouts, some call this value "waittime". In the future this should allow us to more easily change the underlying implementation e.g. running traceroute serially or in parallel without the timeout having different meanings depending on the implementation.

Additional Notes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Describe how to test/QA your changes

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 9e75744c-2250-4a90-aa11-a801e822150c Metrics dashboard Target profiles

Baseline: d99d8f2
Comparison: b9ed93d

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +1.69 [-11.09, +14.46] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization +0.83 [+0.78, +0.88] 1 Logs
idle memory utilization +0.29 [+0.26, +0.33] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.10 [-0.88, +0.68] 1 Logs
basic_py_check % cpu utilization -1.04 [-3.56, +1.49] 1 Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -1.08 [-1.89, -0.27] 1 Logs
pycheck_lots_of_tags % cpu utilization -1.28 [-3.81, +1.24] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed
idle memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

Copy link
Contributor

@jeremy-hanna jeremy-hanna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 for ASC owned files

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv create-vm --pipeline-id=43676180 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit b9ed93d

@ken-schneider ken-schneider requested a review from a team as a code owner September 5, 2024 20:41
Copy link
Contributor

@alai97 alai97 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, small copy suggestion.

## Specifies how much time the full traceroute should take
## in milliseconds
## @param timeout - integer - optional - default: 1000
## Specifies how much time in milliseconds traceroute should
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
## Specifies how much time in milliseconds traceroute should
## Specifies how much time in milliseconds the traceroute should

## Specifies how much time the full traceroute should take
## in milliseconds
## @param timeout - integer - optional - default: 1000
## Specifies how much time in milliseconds traceroute should
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
## Specifies how much time in milliseconds traceroute should
## Specifies how much time in milliseconds the traceroute should

@ken-schneider
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Sep 7, 2024

🚂 MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 23m.

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit d44450f into main Sep 7, 2024
222 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the ken/netpath-297-refactor-timeout branch September 7, 2024 01:42
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.58.0 milestone Sep 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants