Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[EBPF] Fixes in kmt.gen-config #27856

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024

Conversation

gjulianm
Copy link
Contributor

@gjulianm gjulianm commented Jul 23, 2024

What does this PR do?

Some minor fixes for generating KMT config and instances

  • Notify the user when --arch is used without --ci in kmt.gen-config, as in that case the value is unused and can lead to confusion
  • Improved UX when using kmt.gen-config --from-ci-pipeline, showing which failed jobs are selected and notifying when there are no failed jobs to use.
  • Raise an error when the user tries to launch a stack without a SSH key, as that will render the instance inaccesible.

Motivation

Additional Notes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Describe how to test/QA your changes

@gjulianm gjulianm added this to the 7.57.0 milestone Jul 23, 2024
@gjulianm gjulianm self-assigned this Jul 23, 2024
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Jul 23, 2024

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 39881467 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:
  • tests_deb-arm64-py3
  • tests_deb-x64-py3
  • tests_flavor_dogstatsd_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_heroku_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_iot_deb-x64
  • tests_rpm-arm64-py3
  • tests_rpm-x64-py3
  • tests_windows-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jul 23, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 027d8450-9a83-4840-ace6-aabd081a8b22 Metrics dashboard Target profiles

Baseline: 597291d
Comparison: 5716c92

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI links
basic_py_check % cpu utilization +2.11 [-0.44, +4.65] Logs
idle memory utilization +1.10 [+1.06, +1.14] Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput +0.67 [-0.14, +1.49] Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.46 [-12.54, +13.45] Logs
pycheck_1000_100byte_tags % cpu utilization +0.37 [-4.43, +5.16] Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.22 [-1.11, +0.67] Logs
file_tree memory utilization -1.61 [-1.71, -1.51] Logs

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@gjulianm gjulianm added changelog/no-changelog qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Jul 23, 2024
@gjulianm gjulianm changed the title [EBPF] Remove --arch argument from kmt.gen-config task [EBPF] Fixes in kmt.gen-config Jul 23, 2024
@gjulianm gjulianm marked this pull request as ready for review July 23, 2024 14:20
@gjulianm gjulianm requested a review from a team as a code owner July 23, 2024 14:20
@gjulianm gjulianm removed the qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests label Jul 23, 2024
@gjulianm
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Jul 23, 2024

🚂 MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 22m.

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 386130a into main Jul 23, 2024
328 of 332 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the guillermo.julian/remove-arch-argument-gen-config branch July 23, 2024 16:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation team/ebpf-platform
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants