Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ASCII-2048] use telemetry component inside the autodiscovery component #27805

Merged

Conversation

GustavoCaso
Copy link
Member

@GustavoCaso GustavoCaso commented Jul 22, 2024

What does this PR do?

Updates the autodiscovery component to use the telemetry component instead of the pkg/telemetry

Motivation

We are moving away from using globals to declare our telemetry metrics

Additional Notes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Describe how to test/QA your changes

  • Ensure the telemetry metrics are being emitted as before

@github-actions github-actions bot added the team/container-platform The Container Platform Team label Jul 22, 2024
@GustavoCaso GustavoCaso changed the title use telemetry component inside the autodiscovery component [ASCII-2048] use telemetry component inside the autodiscovery component Jul 22, 2024
@GustavoCaso GustavoCaso force-pushed the use-telemetry-component-for-autodiscovery-component branch 2 times, most recently from f4586e0 to b9cb736 Compare July 23, 2024 08:23
@GustavoCaso GustavoCaso added this to the 7.57.0 milestone Jul 23, 2024
@GustavoCaso GustavoCaso marked this pull request as ready for review July 23, 2024 08:26
@GustavoCaso GustavoCaso requested review from a team as code owners July 23, 2024 08:26
@GustavoCaso GustavoCaso force-pushed the use-telemetry-component-for-autodiscovery-component branch from b9cb736 to 8bb4d77 Compare July 23, 2024 08:49
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jul 23, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv create-vm --pipeline-id=40217277 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 1d0674d

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jul 23, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: a2bcc658-a190-4f82-8d36-858c0ef6f416 Metrics dashboard Target profiles

Baseline: 190d7b8
Comparison: 1d0674d

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI links
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +4.47 [-8.56, +17.51] Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +2.86 [+1.97, +3.76] Logs
pycheck_1000_100byte_tags % cpu utilization +0.69 [-4.05, +5.43] Logs
file_tree memory utilization +0.36 [+0.29, +0.42] Logs
idle memory utilization +0.15 [+0.12, +0.19] Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] Logs
basic_py_check % cpu utilization -0.65 [-3.26, +1.95] Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -1.01 [-1.82, -0.21] Logs

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

Copy link
Member

@gh123man gh123man left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AML owned files LGTM

@GustavoCaso
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Jul 26, 2024

🚂 MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 22m.

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Jul 26, 2024

MergeQueue: This merge request has conflicts

This merge request conflicts with another merge request ahead in the queue.

The merge requests in front of this one are:

If you need support, contact us on Slack #devflow with those details!

@GustavoCaso
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Jul 29, 2024

🚂 MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 22m.

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit ecff38e into main Jul 29, 2024
232 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the use-telemetry-component-for-autodiscovery-component branch July 29, 2024 08:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants