[tasks] Include Names for include_tasks

[the-real-cphillips]

Currently, the output when running this role is confusing.
It isn't clear what exactly is being skipped for each include_tasks play.

This was initially confusing until I dug into the actual tasks/main.yml
This PR adds a name: parameter to each include_tasks within the tasks/main.yml

While a small nit-picky PR, It makes the output clearer and easier to explain to others, without having to dive into code.

[KSerrania]

Hello @the-real-cphillips,

Thanks for the PR! We released a new major version of the role this Wednesday, so the task list got modified. Would you mind rebasing your PR and adding the name: parameter to the new and modified tasks?

[the-real-cphillips]

Hello @the-real-cphillips,

Thanks for the PR! We released a new major version of the role this Wednesday, so the task list got modified. Would you mind rebasing your PR and adding the name: parameter to the new and modified tasks?

Sure thing! I'll get on it now :)

[KSerrania]

Thanks! I'm adding some suggested changes to make the role work as expected, the merge reverted some changes that were done in the major version bump (mainly some filename changes, and datadog_agent5 got replaced by datadog_agent_major_version).

Once these are added the PR should be good to go!

[KSerrania]

Thanks!
I'm going to merge this PR and release a new version on Monday.

As you mentioned in your commits, we have a few linting errors, but they're tackled by #236 so everything's good here!

[the-real-cphillips]

Thanks!
I'm going to merge this PR and release a new version on Monday.

As you mentioned in your commits, we have a few linting errors, but they're tackled by #236 so everything's good here!

Awesome thanks!

[the-real-cphillips]

@KSerrania probably unrelated here, but has there been any talk about including molecule for testing the role to ensure it's idempotent and works as expected?

I plausibly would be willing to undertake such a thing if there's desired need/want for it.