Skip to content

Transformation System evolution

fstagni edited this page Jun 17, 2015 · 34 revisions

Transformation System evolution

  • Authors: L.Arrabito, F.Stagni, A.Tsaregorodtsev

The goal is to make the TS a completely data-driven system and a 'workflow engine'. To achieve this goal, we have identified 4 steps in order of priority:

  1. Implement MetaFilters
  2. Support for chained Transformations
  3. Use MQ (Message Queue) complementary to polling
  4. DIRAC workflow 'machine' abstraction

1. Implement MetaFilters

To achieve a data-driven system, the TS must expose a Catalog Plugin, instrumenting the following 3 methods:

  • addFile
  • addReplica
  • setMetaData

Also an ApplyQuery utility (here after also called 'filter') is necessary to check if the metadata dictionary of a given file is compatible with the metaqueries of the active Transformations. The similar functionality can be achieved by instrumenting the main File Catalog ( DFC ) with a message emitting mechanism in the events mentioned above. This will be explored.

addFile

The addFile method uses the ApplyQuery utility to filter files having UserMetaData satisfying the query conditions of the active Transformations. In this way new registered data are 'automatically' added to the correct Transformations.

addReplica

The transformation metadata filter can in principle include the location of replicas, processing only data at a given site, for example. Therefore, new tasks can be triggered by addReplica call.

setMetaData

It can happen that new UserMetadata are added to a file once it's already registered. In this case, the file could become eventually eligible to be attached to some Transformation. To cover this case, the setMetaData method should:

  • Get the UserMetaData of the File
  • Update the UserMetaData with the new metadata
  • Apply the filter Utility to the updated metadatadict of the file, and if it passes the filter add the file to the new Transformations (for the Transformations having the file already attached, the add operation should not have any effect)

2. Support for workflows of Transformations

Here we use the word 'workflow' to indicate a sequence of 'chained transformations'. It has not to be confused with the 'job-workflow', which is the workflow executed within a job. In LHCb chained Transformations, e.g. Re-processing -> Merging -> Removal, are handled by a dedicated Production System. The idea is to develop a generalized light system to support chained Transformations, starting from the experience of LHCb, use-cases of CTA, ILC, etc. This system would be much lighter than the LHCb Production System and won't cover all possible use-cases. The idea is that it would serve as basis for each community that could then build its own 'Production System' on top of it.

3. Use MQ (Message Queueing) complementary to polling

The implementation of the 'MetaFilters' as described in 1. is not enough to achieve a completely data-driven system, indeed there are other components of the TS working in polling mode. In particular these componenents are the TransformationAgent, the WFTaskAgent and the RequestTaskAgent.

The idea is to use a MQ system, so that a signal is sent to these 3 Agents to trigger their execution. In particular, when a Transformation is created in the TransformationDB, a signal would be sent to the TransformationAgent which prepares the Tasks. When a new Task is created a signal is sent to the WFTaskAgent or to the RequestTaskAgent to trigger their execution. The signal can carry some useful information, for example the transformations touched by the event, in order to let the agents perform just well focused operations contrary to their behavior in a “polling” mode. The 'polling' mode would also remain active to recover the eventual failures of the MQ system (lost signal, etc.). Each agent should have 2 threads: 1 for the 'MQ mode' listening to the messages, and 1 for the 'polling mode' listening to the 'timer'. The idea is to explore the use of RabbitMQ as MQ System.

4. DIRAC workflow 'machine' abstraction

Once the support of 'chained Transformation' (hereafter 'workflows') is there, the next step is to prepare a generalized interface so that a user is able to easily build its own workflows. This requires to express in the most generalized way the human procedure of building workflows.

Current status

Clone this wiki locally