-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Issues: DILCISBoard/SIARD
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
Interoperability issue of filepath reference for LOBs
question
Questions to the specification
SIARD2.1
Issues that relates to SIARD2.1 and not the CIT Specification
SIARD2.2
Issues that relates to SIARD2.2
#61
opened Sep 29, 2023 by
solfeggietto
SIARD 2.1 and 2.2 specification P_4-2-3 lob with subfolders allowed (Interoperability decision)?
#57
opened Dec 3, 2021 by
solfeggietto
SIARD 2.1 / 2.1.1 metadata.xsd analysis of spec and tools implementations
#55
opened Aug 5, 2021 by
solfeggietto
SIARD should specificy an optional file to have the creation report
#53
opened Oct 2, 2020 by
luis100
Adding filename and format to lobs, suggesting rendering hints for binaries
#46
opened Dec 12, 2019 by
luis100
Interoperability: SIARD 2.1/2.1.1 schema name empty string = valid metadata.xml
#45
opened Jun 6, 2019 by
solfeggietto
Schemas, tables, columns begin at 0 or 1? Suggestion for altering examples.
SIARD2.1
Issues that relates to SIARD2.1 and not the CIT Specification
suggestion
Suggestions for improvements to the specification
#40
opened Apr 16, 2019 by
PhillipTommerholt
Extra structural metadata information (part 2)
Content Information Type
Issues that relates to the CIT specification and not the SIARD format itself
Review comment
this issue originates from the review process
SIARD2.1
Issues that relates to SIARD2.1 and not the CIT Specification
#39
opened Mar 11, 2019 by
PhillipTommerholt
Extra structural metadata information
Content Information Type
Issues that relates to the CIT specification and not the SIARD format itself
Review comment
this issue originates from the review process
SIARD2.1
Issues that relates to SIARD2.1 and not the CIT Specification
#38
opened Mar 11, 2019 by
PhillipTommerholt
Hash algorithms
Review comment
this issue originates from the review process
SIARD2.1
Issues that relates to SIARD2.1 and not the CIT Specification
#37
opened Mar 11, 2019 by
PhillipTommerholt
LOB message digest, "checksum type" and "checksum value"
Review comment
this issue originates from the review process
SIARD2.1
Issues that relates to SIARD2.1 and not the CIT Specification
#36
opened Mar 11, 2019 by
PhillipTommerholt
lobfolder
Content Information Type
Issues that relates to the CIT specification and not the SIARD format itself
Review comment
this issue originates from the review process
SIARD2.1
Issues that relates to SIARD2.1 and not the CIT Specification
#35
opened Mar 11, 2019 by
PhillipTommerholt
"Checksum type" and "checksum value" in two different elements
Review comment
this issue originates from the review process
SIARD2.1
Issues that relates to SIARD2.1 and not the CIT Specification
#34
opened Mar 11, 2019 by
PhillipTommerholt
Identifier for database extract
Review comment
this issue originates from the review process
SIARD2.1
Issues that relates to SIARD2.1 and not the CIT Specification
#33
opened Mar 11, 2019 by
PhillipTommerholt
Splitting databases
Review comment
this issue originates from the review process
SIARD2.1
Issues that relates to SIARD2.1 and not the CIT Specification
#32
opened Mar 11, 2019 by
PhillipTommerholt
Size of IPs
Content Information Type
Issues that relates to the CIT specification and not the SIARD format itself
Review comment
this issue originates from the review process
#31
opened Mar 11, 2019 by
PhillipTommerholt
TAR in addition to ZIP
Review comment
this issue originates from the review process
SIARD2.1
Issues that relates to SIARD2.1 and not the CIT Specification
#30
opened Mar 11, 2019 by
PhillipTommerholt
zipped vs unzipped SIARD
Review comment
this issue originates from the review process
SIARD2.1
Issues that relates to SIARD2.1 and not the CIT Specification
#29
opened Mar 11, 2019 by
PhillipTommerholt
Question regarding SIARD not being an IP
Review comment
this issue originates from the review process
SIARD2.1
Issues that relates to SIARD2.1 and not the CIT Specification
#28
opened Mar 11, 2019 by
PhillipTommerholt
Documentation on how BLOBs CLOBs were treated in original database
Content Information Type
Issues that relates to the CIT specification and not the SIARD format itself
Review comment
this issue originates from the review process
SIARD2.1
Issues that relates to SIARD2.1 and not the CIT Specification
#27
opened Mar 11, 2019 by
PhillipTommerholt
Previous Next
ProTip!
Type g i on any issue or pull request to go back to the issue listing page.