Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Fixes expectations no arg exp but act args passed
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
IvoGoman committed Aug 1, 2022
1 parent fd316ea commit 37b1bab
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 4 changed files with 16 additions and 13 deletions.
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions expectations_go18.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ func (e *ExpectedQuery) WillReturnRows(rows ...*Rows) *ExpectedQuery {

func (e *queryBasedExpectation) argsMatches(args []driver.NamedValue) error {
if nil == e.args {
if len(args) > 0 {
return fmt.Errorf("expected 0, but got %d arguments", len(args))
}
return nil
}
if len(args) != len(e.args) {
Expand Down
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions expectations_go18_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ import (
func TestQueryExpectationArgComparison(t *testing.T) {
e := &queryBasedExpectation{converter: driver.DefaultParameterConverter}
against := []driver.NamedValue{{Value: int64(5), Ordinal: 1}}
if err := e.argsMatches(against); err != nil {
t.Errorf("arguments should match, since the no expectation was set, but got err: %s", err)
if err := e.argsMatches(against); err == nil {
t.Errorf("arguments should not match, since no expectation was set, but argument was passed")
}

e.args = []driver.Value{5, "str"}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -104,8 +104,8 @@ func TestQueryExpectationArgComparisonBool(t *testing.T) {
func TestQueryExpectationNamedArgComparison(t *testing.T) {
e := &queryBasedExpectation{converter: driver.DefaultParameterConverter}
against := []driver.NamedValue{{Value: int64(5), Name: "id"}}
if err := e.argsMatches(against); err != nil {
t.Errorf("arguments should match, since the no expectation was set, but got err: %s", err)
if err := e.argsMatches(against); err == nil {
t.Errorf("arguments should not match, since no expectation was set, but argument was passed")
}

e.args = []driver.Value{
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions sqlmock_go18_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -435,9 +435,9 @@ func TestContextExecErrorDelay(t *testing.T) {
defer db.Close()

// test that return of error is delayed
var delay time.Duration
delay = 100 * time.Millisecond
var delay time.Duration = 100 * time.Millisecond
mock.ExpectExec("^INSERT INTO articles").
WithArgs("hello").
WillReturnError(errors.New("slow fail")).
WillDelayFor(delay)

Expand Down
14 changes: 7 additions & 7 deletions sqlmock_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -959,7 +959,7 @@ func TestPrepareExec(t *testing.T) {
mock.ExpectBegin()
ep := mock.ExpectPrepare("INSERT INTO ORDERS\\(ID, STATUS\\) VALUES \\(\\?, \\?\\)")
for i := 0; i < 3; i++ {
ep.ExpectExec().WillReturnResult(NewResult(1, 1))
ep.ExpectExec().WithArgs(i, "Hello"+strconv.Itoa(i)).WillReturnResult(NewResult(1, 1))
}
mock.ExpectCommit()
tx, _ := db.Begin()
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ func TestPreparedStatementCloseExpectation(t *testing.T) {
defer db.Close()

ep := mock.ExpectPrepare("INSERT INTO ORDERS").WillBeClosed()
ep.ExpectExec().WillReturnResult(NewResult(1, 1))
ep.ExpectExec().WithArgs(1, "Hello").WillReturnResult(NewResult(1, 1))

stmt, err := db.Prepare("INSERT INTO ORDERS(ID, STATUS) VALUES (?, ?)")
if err != nil {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1102,9 +1102,9 @@ func TestExecExpectationErrorDelay(t *testing.T) {
defer db.Close()

// test that return of error is delayed
var delay time.Duration
delay = 100 * time.Millisecond
var delay time.Duration = 100 * time.Millisecond
mock.ExpectExec("^INSERT INTO articles").
WithArgs("hello").
WillReturnError(errors.New("slow fail")).
WillDelayFor(delay)

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1230,10 +1230,10 @@ func Test_sqlmock_Prepare_and_Exec(t *testing.T) {

mock.ExpectPrepare("SELECT (.+) FROM users WHERE (.+)")
expected := NewResult(1, 1)
mock.ExpectExec("SELECT (.+) FROM users WHERE (.+)").
mock.ExpectExec("SELECT (.+) FROM users WHERE (.+)").WithArgs("test").
WillReturnResult(expected)
expectedRows := mock.NewRows([]string{"id", "name", "email"}).AddRow(1, "test", "[email protected]")
mock.ExpectQuery("SELECT (.+) FROM users WHERE (.+)").WillReturnRows(expectedRows)
mock.ExpectQuery("SELECT (.+) FROM users WHERE (.+)").WithArgs("test").WillReturnRows(expectedRows)

got, err := mock.(*sqlmock).Prepare(query)
if err != nil {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1326,7 +1326,7 @@ func Test_sqlmock_Query(t *testing.T) {
}
defer db.Close()
expectedRows := mock.NewRows([]string{"id", "name", "email"}).AddRow(1, "test", "[email protected]")
mock.ExpectQuery("SELECT (.+) FROM users WHERE (.+)").WillReturnRows(expectedRows)
mock.ExpectQuery("SELECT (.+) FROM users WHERE (.+)").WithArgs("test").WillReturnRows(expectedRows)
query := "SELECT name, email FROM users WHERE name = ?"
rows, err := mock.(*sqlmock).Query(query, []driver.Value{"test"})
if err != nil {
Expand Down

2 comments on commit 37b1bab

@chichu1439
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why must need use args

@IvoGoman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why must need use args

@chichu1439 please have a look at #329. Which will make this strict validation optional.

Please sign in to comment.