-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 174
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TokenFactory (v12) #368
TokenFactory (v12) #368
Conversation
@faddat Do we want to merge this in now since it also has the v12 upgrade handler? |
Yes |
Co-authored-by: Udit Gulati <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Udit Gulati <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Udit Gulati <[email protected]>
I think we should set it to 1 JUNO or higher. |
Agree that main thing is to charge something to avoid spam. Given that JUNO current value is hovering around $2 would say it's not unreasonable to be higher, but suspect that the marginal effect between say 0.1JUNO and like 10JUNO is probably negligible in terms of effect |
@the-frey Currently someone could spam upload CW20s for free. Given the bank module has better queries I do feel there is less overhead overall for a chain. Most developers will need at minimum 2 tokens most likely, one for messing around first & one for actual production. I feel keeping the barrier to entry really low to start is best course of action. If we find lots of spam, we can gov prop to increase param as needed |
Yep, happy with 1JUNO as a nominal fee |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The road to uni
Close #334