feat: add serve tools page #893
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 203c8ad in 46 seconds
More details
- Looked at
177lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3drafted comments based on config settings.
1. docs/patterns/tools/serve-tools.mdx:55
- Draft comment:
import openai
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The current import statement is precise and imports only what is needed. The suggestion to import the entire module is not justified unless there is a need to use other parts of the module, which is not evident from the provided code. Therefore, the comment does not indicate a necessary code change.
I might be missing the context where other parts of the openai module are used, but based on the provided code, only the OpenAI class is utilized.
Given the provided code, there is no indication that other parts of the openai module are needed, so the current import statement is appropriate.
The comment suggesting a change in the import statement is not necessary and should be deleted.
2. docs/patterns/tools/serve-tools.mdx:84
- Draft comment:
openai_client = openai
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The suggestion seems to change the type of 'openai_client' from an instance of 'OpenAI' to something else, possibly a module or variable. Without further context on what 'openai' refers to, this change could introduce errors. The original code seems more likely to be correct if 'OpenAI()' is a class instantiation.
I might be missing the context of what 'openai' refers to. If 'openai' is indeed the correct object to use, the suggestion would be valid. However, without this context, it's safer to assume the original code is correct.
Given the lack of context, it's reasonable to assume the original code is correct unless there's strong evidence to suggest otherwise.
Delete the comment as it suggests a change without strong evidence that the original code is incorrect.
3. docs/patterns/tools/serve-tools.mdx:102
- Draft comment:
response = openai.ChatCompletion.create(
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment suggests a specific change in the method call, which could indicate a potential issue with the current implementation. If 'openai.ChatCompletion.create' is indeed the correct method, then the comment is valid and should be kept. However, without additional context or documentation, it's challenging to confirm the correctness of this suggestion.
I might be missing the specific version or context of the OpenAI library being used, which could affect the validity of the suggested change. The current method might be correct for a specific version or setup.
Given the lack of context, it's safer to assume the comment might be correct if it suggests a specific and actionable change. However, without strong evidence, it's difficult to be certain.
The comment suggests a specific change that could be correct, but without strong evidence or additional context, it's not possible to confirm its validity. Therefore, the comment should be deleted.
Workflow ID: wflow_1UTeL1RXc9LJUeii
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
| @app.post("/execute_task") | ||
| async def execute_task(request: TaskRequest): | ||
| response = openai_client.chat.completions.create( | ||
| model="gpt-4o-mini", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The model name gpt-4o-mini appears to be incorrect. Based on the codebase patterns and OpenAI's available models, you should use a standard model name like gpt-4-turbo-preview or gpt-4-1106-preview. Using an invalid model name will cause API calls to fail.
| <CodeGroup> | ||
| ```python main.py | ||
| @app.post("/execute_task") | ||
| async def execute_task(request: TaskRequest): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The endpoint implementation lacks error handling. Consider adding try-catch blocks to handle potential API errors from both OpenAI and Composio. This will make the endpoint more robust and provide better error messages to clients.
Code Review SummaryOverall, the documentation addition is well-structured and provides a good introduction to serving tools over endpoints. However, there are a few important issues that need to be addressed:
Rating: 7/10 - Good structure and content, but needs fixes for critical issues before merging. |
|
This comment was generated by github-actions[bot]! JS SDK Coverage Report📊 Coverage report for JS SDK can be found at the following URL: 📁 Test report folder can be found at the following URL: |
Important
Adds documentation for serving tools over an endpoint using FastAPI, OpenAI, and Composio, with setup and testing instructions.
serve-tools.mdxto document creating a REST API endpoint using FastAPI, OpenAI, and Composio.curland optional steps for using specific actions.mint.jsonto includepatterns/tools/serve-toolsin the navigation under the "Tools" section.This description was created by
for 203c8ad. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.