Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: restructure, add types in local-tools #83

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jun 1, 2024

Conversation

utkarsh-dixit
Copy link
Collaborator

@utkarsh-dixit utkarsh-dixit commented May 31, 2024

🚀 This description was created by Ellipsis for commit 1f2d8d8

Summary:

This pull request restructures various local tools into modular actions with type annotations, enhancing maintainability, scalability, and type safety, and updates documentation extensively.

Key points:

  • Restructured local tools into separate actions with clear request and response models
  • Added type annotations using Python's typing module and Pydantic
  • Enhanced maintainability and scalability of the codebase
  • Ensured type safety and clear API contracts for each action
  • Updated classes: CmdManagerTool, HistoryKeeper, LocalWorkspace, Mathematical
  • Extensively updated documentation in docs/adding-local-tool.md

Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to 9d94c83 in 2 minutes and 7 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 746 lines of code in 17 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 0 drafted comments based on config settings.

Workflow ID: wflow_ZcQs4W3BBQsDlPMh


Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

composio/local_tools/file/actions/read_file.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -60,34 +44,3 @@ def execute(self, request: RagToolQueryRequest, authorisation_data: dict = {}):
return f"Error querying knowledge base: {e}"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The method should return a RagToolQueryResponse object instead of a string to adhere to the defined response schema.

Suggested change
return f"Error querying knowledge base: {e}"
return RagToolQueryResponse(response=response)

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on a607fb1 in 2 minutes and 25 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 809 lines of code in 38 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. composio/local_tools/file/actions/read_file.py:36
  • Draft comment:
    The implementation of the execute method in ReadFile correctly handles file reading and error management. Good use of Path.read_text with proper exception handling.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0%
    The execute method in the ReadFile class is using the read_text method from the Path class to read the file contents. This method is correctly used to read the file as text, which is suitable for the purpose of this action. The method also handles exceptions properly by catching them and returning an error message in the response. This is a good practice as it prevents the application from crashing and provides useful error information to the caller.

Workflow ID: wflow_QL8eVZWU2ZFgRZvH


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 35a1c60 in 1 minute and 8 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 11 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. composio/local_tools/__init__.py:7
  • Draft comment:
    The PR description mentions significant restructuring and adding type annotations, but this diff only shows the import of the Mathematical module. Can you confirm if all intended changes are included in this PR?
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.

Workflow ID: wflow_5UggscCtNBFrsvOu


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on b451ad2 in 1 minute and 9 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 13 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. composio/local_tools/webtool/actions/scrape_website_content.py:4
  • Draft comment:
    Please verify the import path for Action. If Action is located in a submodule named tool, the correct import should be:
from composio.tools.local.tool import Action
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.

Workflow ID: wflow_lioqm5Zfwv6vtPv1


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 8663de1 in 1 minute and 9 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 80 lines of code in 6 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. composio/client/local_handler.py:1
  • Draft comment:
    The PR description mentions the addition of type annotations, but the provided code snippets do not show any type annotations being added. Please ensure that the PR accurately reflects the changes made.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.

Workflow ID: wflow_JkrF8orXrIovPafd


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 67f26bb in 1 minute and 31 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 1010 lines of code in 20 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 0 drafted comments based on config settings.

Workflow ID: wflow_QyPwDvgBFT2U3jUb


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 7bb7d8f in 1 minute and 35 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 154 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. docs/adding-local-tool.md:78
  • Draft comment:
    The variable response_data is used in the return statement but it is not defined anywhere in the provided code snippet. This might lead to confusion or errors. Please ensure to define response_data before using it in the return statement.
# Example:
response_data = {"result": "Processed text: " + request_data.text}
return {"execution_details": {"executed": True}, "response_data": response_data}
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.

Workflow ID: wflow_OnNsCnhY2MxQu1ML


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 09eccb1 in 3 minutes and 7 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 46 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 0 drafted comments based on config settings.

Workflow ID: wflow_P5dmjOYN6hEDtO1h


Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

docs/adding-local-tool.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 6c93096 in 1 minute and 5 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 72 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. docs/adding-local-tool.md:113
  • Draft comment:
    Removing the explicit example code for creating a new local tool and replacing it with a reference to existing tools might reduce the accessibility of the documentation for new developers. Consider reinstating the example or providing a direct link to a well-documented example within the repository.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.

Workflow ID: wflow_7GSxJPitgHi6aNNX


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 67a14a7 in 1 minute and 5 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 18 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. docs/adding-local-tool.md:3
  • Draft comment:
    There's a grammatical error in the use of 'it's'. It should be 'its' to denote possession.
This document guides you through adding a new local tool and its actions.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.

Workflow ID: wflow_rkW7ylRZYEyl5SQK


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on f6cf346 in 1 minute and 43 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 11 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 0 drafted comments based on config settings.

Workflow ID: wflow_Hjpe2yW1VrBVs3MH


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 21b9fa2 in 1 minute and 31 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 20 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. docs/adding-local-tool.md:110
  • Draft comment:
    The documentation still instructs to register the new tool in composio/client/local_handler.py, which seems outdated based on the PR description. Please update this section to reflect the correct file or process for registering new tools as per the latest changes.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.

Workflow ID: wflow_4GVyWbG9cj6XGxKY


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 1f2d8d8 in 2 minutes and 10 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 13 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 0 drafted comments based on config settings.

Workflow ID: wflow_tBiacyWTnCn9ZQg0


Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

docs/adding-local-tool.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@utkarsh-dixit utkarsh-dixit merged commit 2d62f5b into master Jun 1, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
@angrybayblade angrybayblade deleted the fx-restructure-local-toools branch June 13, 2024 11:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants