Applied formatting.

[EmbeddedDevops1]

PR Type

formatting

---

Description

• Applied consistent code formatting across multiple files for improved readability and style.
• Reformatted docstrings and code blocks to enhance clarity.
• Adjusted indentation and alignment for better code structure.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Formatting

11 files CoverAgent.py Code formatting and style improvements                                      cover_agent/CoverAgent.py Added newlines for better readability. Reformatted code for consistent style. +4/-1      CoverageProcessor.py Enhanced readability through code reformatting                      cover_agent/CoverageProcessor.py Reformatted docstrings and code blocks. Improved readability by adjusting indentation. +52/-36  UnitTestDB.py Code style consistency improvements                                            cover_agent/UnitTestDB.py Reformatted code for consistent style. Added newlines for better readability. +36/-20  UnitTestGenerator.py Code formatting and readability enhancements                          cover_agent/UnitTestGenerator.py Reformatted code for consistent style. Improved readability by adjusting indentation. +21/-13  test_app.py Minor formatting adjustment                                                            templated_tests/python_fastapi/test_app.py Added newline for better readability. +1/-1      test_CoverAgent.py Code style and readability improvements                                    tests/test_CoverAgent.py Added newlines for better readability. Reformatted code for consistent style. +6/-4      test_CoverageProcessor.py Code formatting and readability enhancements                          tests/test_CoverageProcessor.py Reformatted code for consistent style. Improved readability by adjusting indentation. +52/-25  test_UnitTestDB.py Code style consistency improvements                                            tests/test_UnitTestDB.py Added newlines for better readability. Reformatted code for consistent style. +10/-6    test_UnitTestGenerator.py Code formatting and readability enhancements                          tests/test_UnitTestGenerator.py Reformatted code for consistent style. Improved readability by adjusting indentation. +2/-2      test_version.py Minor formatting adjustment                                                            tests/test_version.py Removed trailing newline for consistency. +0/-1      increase_coverage.py Code alignment improvement                                                              tests_integration/increase_coverage.py Adjusted alignment for better readability. +1/-1

---

💡 PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

Action: test

Failed stage: Set up job [❌]

Failure summary: The action failed because it uses a deprecated version of the actions/upload-artifact action. The version used is v2, which is no longer supported. The failure occurred automatically due to this deprecation.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 27: RepositoryProjects: write 28: SecurityEvents: write 29: Statuses: write 30: ##[endgroup] 31: Secret source: Actions 32: Prepare workflow directory 33: Prepare all required actions 34: Getting action download info 35: ##[error]This request has been automatically failed because it uses a deprecated version of `actions/upload-artifact: v2`. Learn more: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-02-13-deprecation-notice-v1-and-v2-of-the-artifact-actions/

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Key issues to review Code Formatting The changes in this file are primarily formatting-related. While not a critical issue, it's important to ensure that the new formatting is consistent with the project's style guide. Potential Bug The change on line 173 adds a new line that initializes self.last_coverage_percentages[key] to 0. This could potentially change the behavior of the code if this dictionary was previously relying on KeyError exceptions for non-existent keys. Code Clarity The changes in this file involve splitting long lines of code into multiple lines. While this improves readability, it's important to verify that the logic remains unchanged, especially in complex expressions or function calls.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Use specific exception handling instead of bare except clauses Consider using a more specific exception type instead of a bare except clause. This helps in catching and handling specific exceptions more effectively. cover_agent/UnitTestDB.py [78-101] try: result = ( session.query(UnitTestGenerationAttempt) .filter_by(id=attempt_id) .options( load_only( UnitTestGenerationAttempt.id, UnitTestGenerationAttempt.run_time, UnitTestGenerationAttempt.status, UnitTestGenerationAttempt.reason, UnitTestGenerationAttempt.exit_code, UnitTestGenerationAttempt.stderr, UnitTestGenerationAttempt.stdout, UnitTestGenerationAttempt.test_code, UnitTestGenerationAttempt.imports, UnitTestGenerationAttempt.original_test_file, UnitTestGenerationAttempt.processed_test_file, ) ) .one() .__dict__ ) return result except NoResultFound: return None +except SQLAlchemyError as e: + logging.error(f"Database error: {e}") + return None Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion is valid as it proposes adding specific exception handling for SQLAlchemyError, which can improve error handling and debugging. However, it addresses a minor improvement rather than a critical issue, hence a moderate score.	7