fix: look beyond first page of repo workflows

[pmrotule]

Closes #198

I hope you'll like my solution! I tested it already and it fixed the issue in our case where the workflow was found in the second page of results.

[Codex-]

Thanks for submitting this PR!

Octokit actually provides a way to iterate over pages, we should probably adopt that method, an example is here:
https://github.com/Codex-/knip-reporter/blob/main/src/api.ts#L51

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (78fb303) 99.24% compared to head (c7b1887) 99.31%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #199      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.24%   99.31%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines         399      435      +36     
  Branches       50       53       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits          396      432      +36     
  Misses          3        3              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[pmrotule]

Thanks for submitting this PR!

Octokit actually provides a way to iterate over pages, we should probably adopt that method, an example is here: https://github.com/Codex-/knip-reporter/blob/main/src/api.ts#L51

Great stuff! I wasn't aware of it. I'll quickly make the change.

[Codex-]

Tests failing, the tests can be tricky, if you're happy to wait I can try address them on Friday or you can see how I handled testing against this in the knip-reporter repository and update the tests

[pmrotule]

Tests failing, the tests can be tricky, if you're happy to wait I can try address them on Friday or you can see how I handled testing against this in the knip-reporter repository and update the tests

Should be good now. There was also an issue with the token so I assumed it's because I'm the one who pushed the commit and I don't have the right access. I didn't push the update on the bundle this time. Feel free to take it from there.

[Codex-]

Thank you so much for your work on this, hugely appreciated

[pmrotule]

@Codex- Just so you know, it seems like the v1 tag was not yet updated to the latest version 1.12.0.

[Codex-]

Ah I see, it rejected when I did it originally, fixed now! Thanks for pointing that out @pmrotule