Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: updated extra context issue #517

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

sauravpanda
Copy link
Member

@sauravpanda sauravpanda commented Sep 5, 2024

Improve Code Review Feedback

Overview

This pull request aims to enhance the code review functionality of the Kaizen system. It introduces several key changes and new features to improve the quality and effectiveness of the code review process.

Changes

  • Key Changes:
    • Implemented a new filtering mechanism to only consider code review issues with a severity level of 5 or higher and a negative sentiment.
    • Removed the user parameter from the process_pr function, as it was not being used.
    • Refactored the _process_files_generator function to accept a new custom_context parameter, which can be used to pass additional context information to the code review process.
  • New Features:
    • Added the ability to re-evaluate the code review response, which can be useful for updating the feedback based on changes made to the pull request.
  • Refactoring:
    • Cleaned up the main.py file in the examples/code_review directory by removing the unused user parameter from the process_pr function call.

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Original Description

@sauravpanda sauravpanda linked an issue Sep 5, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

kaizen-bot bot commented Sep 5, 2024

🔍 Code Review Summary

All Clear: This commit looks good! 👍

Overview

  • Total Feedbacks: 1 (Critical: 0, Refinements: 1)
  • Files Affected: 1
  • Code Quality: [█████████████████░░░] 85% (Good)

🟠 Refinement Suggestions:

These are not critical issues, but addressing them could further improve the code:

Logic Error (1 issues)
1. Potential logic flaw in filtering model issues based on severity and sentiment.

📁 File: .experiments/code_review/evaluate.py:60
⚖️ Type: general
🔍 Description:
The current filtering logic may inadvertently exclude important model issues if the severity is below 5 or sentiment is not negative. This could lead to overlooking significant issues that require attention.
💡 Solution:
Consider revising the filtering logic to ensure that critical issues are not missed. You might want to include a logging mechanism to track filtered issues for further analysis.

Current Code:

if model_issue["severity"] < 5:
            continue
if model_issue["sentiment"] != "negative":
            continue

Suggested Code:

if model_issue["severity"] < 5 and model_issue["sentiment"] != "negative":
            continue  # Log or handle excluded issues appropriately

Test Cases

6 file need updates to their tests. Run !unittest to generate create and update tests.


✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Useful Commands
  • Feedback: Reply with !feedback [your message]
  • Ask PR: Reply with !ask-pr [your question]
  • Review: Reply with !review
  • Explain: Reply with !explain [issue number] for more details on a specific issue
  • Ignore: Reply with !ignore [issue number] to mark an issue as false positive
  • Update Tests: Reply with !unittest to create a PR with test changes

@sauravpanda sauravpanda merged commit 9a83aab into main Sep 5, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

fix: custom context checks
1 participant