Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add internal experimental clima parameters #134

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2021
Merged

Conversation

charleskawczynski
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@yairchn yairchn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@haakon-e
Copy link
Member

haakon-e commented Aug 16, 2021

Shouldn't c_div also be added to

function create_parameter_set(namelist)
TC = TurbulenceConvection
nt = (;
MSLP = 100000.0, # or grab from, e.g., namelist[""][...]
τ_cond_evap = TC.parse_namelist(namelist, "microphysics", "τ_cond_evap"; default = 10.0),
c_ε = TC.parse_namelist(namelist, "turbulence", "EDMF_PrognosticTKE", "entrainment_factor"),
)
return EarthParameterSet(nt)
end

otherwise it would always be 0.4, regardless of the namelist value, no?

@charleskawczynski
Copy link
Member Author

Shouldn't c_div also be added to

Good catch, thanks!

@charleskawczynski charleskawczynski force-pushed the ck/internal_clima_params branch 2 times, most recently from 0145150 to 9d641c6 Compare August 16, 2021 21:56
Copy link
Member

@haakon-e haakon-e left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@charleskawczynski
Copy link
Member Author

bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Aug 16, 2021

@bors bors bot merged commit 3faaf58 into main Aug 16, 2021
@bors bors bot deleted the ck/internal_clima_params branch August 16, 2021 22:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants